From: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mmc: inline the first mmc_scan() on mmc_start_host()
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 11:23:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZCclEE6Qw3on7/eO@snowbird> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFrcdJuyA9B-JDReacT2z1ircDoY4oTXZQ8AVFk6UEFYsw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Ulf,
On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 02:43:10PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 at 01:48, Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > When using dm-verity with a data partition on an emmc device, dm-verity
> > races with the discovery of attached emmc devices. This is because mmc's
> > probing code sets up the host data structure then a work item is
> > scheduled to do discovery afterwards. To prevent this race on init,
> > let's inline the first call to detection, __mm_scan(), and let
> > subsequent detect calls be handled via the workqueue.
>
> In principle, I don't mind the changes in $subject patch, as long as
> it doesn't hurt the overall initialization/boot time. Especially, we
> may have more than one mmc-slot being used, so this needs to be well
> tested.
>
I unfortunately don't have a device with multiple mmcs available. Is
this something you could help me with?
> Although, more importantly, I fail to understand how this is going to
> solve the race condition. Any I/O request to an eMMC or SD requires
> the mmc block device driver to be up and running too, which is getting
> probed from a separate module/driver that's not part of mmc_rescan().
I believe the call chain is something like this:
__mmc_rescan()
mmc_rescan_try_freq()
mmc_attach_mmc()
mmc_add_card()
device_add()
bus_probe_device()
mmc_blk_probe()
The initial calling of this is the host probe. So effectively if there
is a card attached, we're inlining the device_add() call for the card
attached rather than waiting for the workqueue item to kick off.
dm is a part of late_initcall() while mmc is a module_init(), when built
in becoming a device_initcall(). So this solves a race via the initcall
chain. In the current state, device_initcall() finishes and we move onto
the late_initcall() phase. But now, dm is racing with the workqueue to
init the attached emmc device.
Thanks,
Dennis
>
> Kind regards
> Uffe
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > Sigh.. fix missing static declaration.
> >
> > drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 15 +++++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> > index 368f10405e13..fda7ee57dee3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> > @@ -2185,10 +2185,8 @@ int mmc_card_alternative_gpt_sector(struct mmc_card *card, sector_t *gpt_sector)
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_card_alternative_gpt_sector);
> >
> > -void mmc_rescan(struct work_struct *work)
> > +static void __mmc_rescan(struct mmc_host *host)
> > {
> > - struct mmc_host *host =
> > - container_of(work, struct mmc_host, detect.work);
> > int i;
> >
> > if (host->rescan_disable)
> > @@ -2249,6 +2247,14 @@ void mmc_rescan(struct work_struct *work)
> > mmc_schedule_delayed_work(&host->detect, HZ);
> > }
> >
> > +void mmc_rescan(struct work_struct *work)
> > +{
> > + struct mmc_host *host =
> > + container_of(work, struct mmc_host, detect.work);
> > +
> > + __mmc_rescan(host);
> > +}
> > +
> > void mmc_start_host(struct mmc_host *host)
> > {
> > host->f_init = max(min(freqs[0], host->f_max), host->f_min);
> > @@ -2261,7 +2267,8 @@ void mmc_start_host(struct mmc_host *host)
> > }
> >
> > mmc_gpiod_request_cd_irq(host);
> > - _mmc_detect_change(host, 0, false);
> > + host->detect_change = 1;
> > + __mmc_rescan(host);
> > }
> >
> > void __mmc_stop_host(struct mmc_host *host)
> > --
> > 2.40.0
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-31 18:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-29 20:21 [PATCH] mmc: inline the first mmc_scan() on mmc_start_host() Dennis Zhou
2023-03-29 22:56 ` kernel test robot
2023-03-29 23:36 ` kernel test robot
2023-03-29 23:48 ` [PATCH v2] " Dennis Zhou
2023-03-31 12:43 ` Ulf Hansson
2023-03-31 18:23 ` Dennis Zhou [this message]
2023-04-03 9:50 ` Ulf Hansson
2023-04-07 8:24 ` Dennis Zhou
2023-04-11 20:29 ` Dennis Zhou
2023-04-12 11:05 ` Ulf Hansson
2023-05-12 11:42 ` Ulf Hansson
2023-06-08 20:49 ` Dennis Zhou
2023-06-09 6:19 ` Greg KH
2023-06-09 7:16 ` Dennis Zhou
2023-06-09 8:53 ` Greg KH
2023-06-09 8:58 ` Linus Walleij
2023-06-12 14:55 ` Ulf Hansson
2023-06-27 17:20 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-06-27 18:09 ` Biju Das
2023-06-30 11:26 ` Ulf Hansson
2023-06-30 13:34 ` Wolfram Sang
2023-06-30 22:09 ` Dennis Zhou
2023-06-13 14:25 ` [PATCH] " Ulf Hansson
2023-06-15 16:06 ` Dennis Zhou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZCclEE6Qw3on7/eO@snowbird \
--to=dennis@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox