> Note that there are still some inconsistent naming of the functions
> that correspond to the host's capabilities, beyond this series. For
> example those we have in drivers/mmc/core/host.h. Would you mind
> sending another series to rename those too?

Do you mean the mmc_retune* functions? I had this in the cover-letter
because I was unsure how to deal with it:

> > * I intentionally left mmc_can_retune() out because it seems more
> >   consistent with all the other mmc_*_retune() functions

But your comment now tells me I should convert them all to *_host_*,
right?