Re: [PATCH] mmc: core: Add new flag to force hardware reset

[Michael Wu <michael@allwinnertech.com>]

On 9/25/2023 9:59 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> - trimmed cc-list, + Sartak Garg
> 
> On Thu, 14 Sept 2023 at 10:00, Wenchao Chen <wenchao.chen666@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 14 Sept 2023 at 08:04, Michael Wu <michael@allwinnertech.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Entering the recovery system itself indicates a transmission error.
>>> In this situation, we intend to execute the mmc_blk_reset function
>>> to clear any anomalies that may be caused by errors. We have previously
>>> discussed with several MMC device manufacturers, and they expressed
>>> their desire for us to reset the device when errors occur to ensure
>>> stable operation. We aim to make this code compatible with all devices
>>> and ensure its stable performance, so we would like to add this patch
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Michael Wu <michael@allwinnertech.com>
>>
>> like: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mmc/20220603051534.22672-1-quic_sartgarg@quicinc.com/
> 
> Looks like this series didn't make it. I was awaiting a rebase from
> Sartak to apply it, but apparently something got in his way for a new
> submission.
> 
>>
>> You should enable it in the vendor host.
> 
> Yes! We don't want unused code in the core. We need a user of it too.
> 
> May I suggest that you pick up Sartak's patch for the core and thus
> add another patch for the host driver you care about and then
> re-submit it as a small series.
> 
> Kind regards
> Uffe
> 
>>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/mmc/core/block.c | 2 +-
>>>   include/linux/mmc/host.h | 1 +
>>>   2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/block.c b/drivers/mmc/core/block.c
>>> index b5b414a71e0b..29fbe0ddeadb 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/block.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/block.c
>>> @@ -1503,7 +1503,7 @@ void mmc_blk_cqe_recovery(struct mmc_queue *mq)
>>>          pr_debug("%s: CQE recovery start\n", mmc_hostname(host));
>>>
>>>          err = mmc_cqe_recovery(host);
>>> -       if (err)
>>> +       if (err || host->cqe_recovery_reset_always)
>>>                  mmc_blk_reset(mq->blkdata, host, MMC_BLK_CQE_RECOVERY);
>>>          mmc_blk_reset_success(mq->blkdata, MMC_BLK_CQE_RECOVERY);
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/host.h b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
>>> index 62a6847a3b6f..f578541a06b5 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/mmc/host.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
>>> @@ -518,6 +518,7 @@ struct mmc_host {
>>>          int                     cqe_qdepth;
>>>          bool                    cqe_enabled;
>>>          bool                    cqe_on;
>>> +       bool                    cqe_recovery_reset_always;
>>>
>>>          /* Inline encryption support */
>>>   #ifdef CONFIG_MMC_CRYPTO
>>> --
>>> 2.29.0
>>>
Dear Ulf,
I have tested Sartak's patch and it is also able to resolve the issue we 
are currently facing. Therefore, I would like to inquire about the 
expected timeline for merging Sartak's patch.

-- 
Regards,
Michael Wu