From: "Gabriel L. Somlo" <gsomlo@gmail.com>
To: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@gmail.com>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulfh@kernel.org>,
Karol Gugala <kgugala@antmicro.com>,
Mateusz Holenko <mholenko@antmicro.com>,
Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>,
Maciej Dudek <mdudek@internships.antmicro.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Yixun Lan <dlan@gentoo.org>, Longbin Li <looong.bin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] mmc: litex_mmc: Set mandatory idle clocks before CMD0
Date: Thu, 21 May 2026 10:39:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ag8ZFgw3bEOJmO2c@errol.ini.cmu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260521072122.1601215-1-inochiama@gmail.com>
On Thu, May 21, 2026 at 03:21:19PM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
> The litex_mmc driver assumes the card is already probed in the BIOS
> and skip the phy initialization. This will cause the command fail
> like the following when the old card is unplugged and then insert
> a new card:
>
> [ 62.923593] litex-mmc f0004000.mmc: Command (cmd 8) error, status -110
> [ 62.949717] litex-mmc f0004000.mmc: Command (cmd 55) error, status -110
> [ 62.976606] litex-mmc f0004000.mmc: Command (cmd 55) error, status -110
> [ 63.002516] litex-mmc f0004000.mmc: Command (cmd 55) error, status -110
> [ 63.028442] litex-mmc f0004000.mmc: Command (cmd 55) error, status -110
>
> Firstly, fix the clock divider calculation so we can get the right
> clock frequency, then add required clock settings and initialization
> for the CMD 0, so it can probe the new card.
>
> Test Results:
> Rocket:
> # dmesg | grep mmc
> [ 0.109176] litex-mmc 12003000.mmc: LiteX MMC controller initialized.
> [ 0.256926] mmc0: new SDHC card at address aaaa
> [ 0.257058] mmcblk0: mmc0:aaaa WC32G 29.7 GiB
>
> Note: it seems like the rocket give a wrong DMA result when the target
> address is in main memory.
> See issue: https://github.com/enjoy-digital/litex/issues/2464
>
> VexiiRiscv:
> # dmesg | grep mmc
> [ 2.368365] litex-mmc f0004000.mmc: LiteX MMC controller initialized.
> [ 2.576993] mmc0: new SDHC card at address aaaa
> [ 2.588966] mmcblk0: mmc0:aaaa WC32G 29.7 GiB
> [ 2.620197] mmcblk0: p1
For the whole series:
Reviewed-by: Gabriel Somlo <gsomlo@gmail.com>
Thanks,
--Gabriel
> Changed from v4:
> - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mmc/20260517015323.264179-1-inochiama@gmail.com/
> 1. Add a new patch for fixing clock divider calculation
> 2. Move everything in the set_ios() callback.
>
> Changed from v3:
> - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mmc/20260426112016.1370929-1-inochiama@gmail.com/
> 1. Remove patch 1: mmc: litex_mmc: Move litex_mmc_setclk() to bottom for reuse
> 2. Use set_ios() callback to apply the clock change.
>
> Changed from v2:
> - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mmc/20260424013615.470325-1-inochiama@gmail.com/
> 1. Remove the added function forward reference and add a new patch
> for moving litex_mmc_setclk() function
>
> Change from v1:
> - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mmc/20260421025052.755471-1-inochiama@gmail.com/
> 1. use fsleep to replace udelay
>
> Inochi Amaoto (2):
> mmc: litex_mmc: Use DIV_ROUND_UP for more accurate clock calculation
> mmc: litex_mmc: Set mandatory idle clocks before CMD0
>
> drivers/mmc/host/litex_mmc.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.54.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-21 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-21 7:21 [PATCH v5 0/2] mmc: litex_mmc: Set mandatory idle clocks before CMD0 Inochi Amaoto
2026-05-21 7:21 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] mmc: litex_mmc: Use DIV_ROUND_UP for more accurate clock calculation Inochi Amaoto
2026-05-21 7:21 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] mmc: litex_mmc: Set mandatory idle clocks before CMD0 Inochi Amaoto
2026-05-21 14:39 ` Gabriel L. Somlo [this message]
2026-05-29 14:45 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] " Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ag8ZFgw3bEOJmO2c@errol.ini.cmu.edu \
--to=gsomlo@gmail.com \
--cc=dlan@gentoo.org \
--cc=inochiama@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@jms.id.au \
--cc=kgugala@antmicro.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=looong.bin@gmail.com \
--cc=mdudek@internships.antmicro.com \
--cc=mholenko@antmicro.com \
--cc=paulus@ozlabs.org \
--cc=ulfh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox