From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
To: Per Forlin <per.forlin@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org,
Stefan Nilsson XK <stefan.xk.nilsson@stericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sdio: optimized SDIO IRQ handling for single irq
Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 16:22:53 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1105041618400.24613@xanadu.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTik+LWiYYPTqR5pNKsZfSMGGE3xCZg@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 2461 bytes --]
On Wed, 4 May 2011, Per Forlin wrote:
> On 4 May 2011 19:34, Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, 4 May 2011, Per Forlin wrote:
> >
> >> From: Stefan Nilsson XK <stefan.xk.nilsson@stericsson.com>
> >>
> >> If there is only 1 function registered it is possible to
> >> improve performance by directly calling the irq handler
> >> and avoiding the overhead of reading the CCCR registers.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Per Forlin <per.forlin@linaro.org>
> >> Acked-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@stericsson.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> include/linux/mmc/card.h | 1 +
> >> 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c
> >> index b300161..64c4409 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c
> >> @@ -32,6 +32,16 @@ static int process_sdio_pending_irqs(struct mmc_card *card)
> >> int i, ret, count;
> >> unsigned char pending;
> >>
> >> + /*
> >> + * Optimization, if there is only 1 function registered
> >> + * call irq handler directly
> >> + */
> >> + if (card->sdio_single_irq && card->sdio_single_irq->irq_handler) {
> >> + struct sdio_func *func = card->sdio_single_irq;
> >> + func->irq_handler(func);
> >
> > I think there is little point using a func variable here, especially
> > since you already reference the handler pointer in the if() statement.
> > Hence:
> >
> > if (card->sdio_single_irq && card->sdio_single_irq->irq_handler) {
> > card->sdio_single_irq->irq_handler();
> > return 1;
> > }
> >
> What do you think about:
> + struct sdio_func *func = card->sdio_single_irq;
> +
> + /*
> + * Optimization, if there is only 1 function interrupt registered
> + * call irq handler directly
> + */
> + if (func) {
> + func->irq_handler(func);
> + return 1;
> + }
Sure, but I'd move the assignment right before the if() in that case for
clarity:
struct sdio_func *func;
/*
* Optimization, if there is only 1 function interrupt registered
* call irq handler directly
*/
func = card->sdio_single_irq;
if (func) {
func->irq_handler(func);
return 1;
}
[...]
Nicolas
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-04 20:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-04 16:06 [PATCH v2] sdio: optimized SDIO IRQ handling for single irq Per Forlin
2011-05-04 16:06 ` Per Forlin
2011-05-04 16:23 ` Michał Mirosław
2011-05-04 17:00 ` Per Forlin
2011-05-04 17:40 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-05-04 17:34 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-05-04 19:48 ` Per Forlin
2011-05-04 20:22 ` Nicolas Pitre [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.1105041618400.24613@xanadu.home \
--to=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
--cc=linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=per.forlin@linaro.org \
--cc=stefan.xk.nilsson@stericsson.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox