From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pawel Moll Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc, ARM: Add zboot from MMC support for SuperH Mobile ARM Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 10:10:19 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20110109124928.GC25591@verge.net.au> <1294589548.8897.1.camel@rojo> <20110109225042.GB29257@verge.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110109225042.GB29257@verge.net.au> Sender: linux-sh-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Simon Horman Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Magnus Damm , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Yusuke Goda , Paul Mundt , Chris Ball , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 07:50:42 +0900, Simon Horman =20 wrote: >> > Documentation/arm/SH-Mobile/Makefile | 8 + >> > Documentation/arm/SH-Mobile/vrl4.c | 169=20 >> +++++++++++++++++++++ >> How about putting those two into "tools" (in particular "tools/arm") >> instead of "Documentation"? >> Just a thought... ;-) > > Thats fine by me except that tools/arm doesn't exist yet. > It would be good to get some consensus before creating it. I think there is consensus regarding "tools" as a place for user-space= =20 tools - eg. perf tools used to live in "Documentation/..." and then we= re=20 moved to "tools/perf". Now, whether your stuff should be in "tools/SH-Mobile" or=20 "tools/arm/SH-Mobile", I have no opinion ;-) Cheers! Pawe=C5=82