Linux MultiMedia Card development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: haibo.chen@nxp.com, ulf.hansson@linaro.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-imx@nxp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci: correct the tuning command handle for PIO mode
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 14:06:42 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c368ffc9-4752-500b-edd9-676d7f73e2ad@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <76af88e2-d068-dafc-9b17-cd590b3f8953@intel.com>

On 20/08/21 2:04 pm, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 13/08/21 3:34 pm, haibo.chen@nxp.com wrote:
>> From: Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@nxp.com>
>>
>> If sdhci use PIO mode, and use mmc_send_tuning() to send the
>> tuning command, system will stuck because of the storm irq
>> of sdhci. For PIO mode, use mmc_send_tuning(), it will trigger
>> buffer_read_ready interrupt and data transfer complete interrupt.
>> In current code logic, it will directly return in sdhci_data_irq,
>> can not call the sdhci_transfer_pio(). So the buffer_read_ready
>> interrupt storm happen. So for standard tuning method, need to
>> excluse this case.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@nxp.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>

Although there are unnecessary parenthesis around !host->data

> 
>> ---
>>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 10 ++++++++--
>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
>> index aba6e10b8605..acee54b368b0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
>> @@ -3278,8 +3278,14 @@ static void sdhci_data_irq(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 intmask)
>>  {
>>  	u32 command;
>>  
>> -	/* CMD19 generates _only_ Buffer Read Ready interrupt */
>> -	if (intmask & SDHCI_INT_DATA_AVAIL) {
>> +	/*
>> +	 * CMD19 generates _only_ Buffer Read Ready interrupt if
>> +	 * use sdhci_send_tuning.
>> +	 * Need to exclude this case: PIO mode and use mmc_send_tuning,
>> +	 * If not, sdhci_transfer_pio will never be called, make the
>> +	 * SDHCI_INT_DATA_AVAIL always there, stuck in irq storm.
>> +	 */
>> +	if ((intmask & SDHCI_INT_DATA_AVAIL) && (!host->data)) {
>>  		command = SDHCI_GET_CMD(sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_COMMAND));
>>  		if (command == MMC_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK ||
>>  		    command == MMC_SEND_TUNING_BLOCK_HS200) {
>>
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-20 11:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-13 12:34 [PATCH] mmc: sdhci: correct the tuning command handle for PIO mode haibo.chen
2021-08-20 11:04 ` Adrian Hunter
2021-08-20 11:06   ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
2021-08-24 14:56 ` Ulf Hansson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c368ffc9-4752-500b-edd9-676d7f73e2ad@intel.com \
    --to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=haibo.chen@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox