From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@gmail.com>
To: axboe@kernel.dk, ulf.hansson@linaro.org, adrian.hunter@intel.com
Cc: arnd@arndb.de, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
paolo.valente@linaro.org, ming.lei@redhat.com,
orsonzhai@gmail.com, zhang.lyra@gmail.com,
baolin.wang7@gmail.com, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] Add MMC packed request support
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2020 17:38:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1587888520.git.baolin.wang7@gmail.com> (raw)
Hi All,
Now some SD/MMC controllers can support packed command or packed request,
that means it can package multiple requests to host controller to be handled
at one time, which can improve the I/O performence. Thus this patch set
tries to add the MMC packed request function to support packed request or
packed command.
In this patch set, I extanded commit_rqs() to do batch processing suggested
by Ming, to allow dispatching a batch of requests to hardware and expanded
the MMC software queue to support packed request. I also implemented the
SD host ADMA3 transfer mode to support packed request. The ADMA3 transfer
mode can process a multi-block data transfer by using a pair of command
descriptor and ADMA2 descriptor. In future we can easily expand the MMC
packed function to support packed command.
Below are some comparison data between packed request and non-packed request
with fio tool. The fio command I used is like below with changing the
'--rw' parameter and enabling the direct IO flag to measure the actual hardware
transfer speed. I tested 5 times for each case and output a average speed.
./fio --filename=/dev/mmcblk0p30 --direct=1 --iodepth=20 --rw=read --bs=4K --size=512M --group_reporting --numjobs=20 --name=test_read
My eMMC card working at HS400 Enhanced strobe mode:
[ 2.229856] mmc0: new HS400 Enhanced strobe MMC card at address 0001
[ 2.237566] mmcblk0: mmc0:0001 HBG4a2 29.1 GiB
[ 2.242621] mmcblk0boot0: mmc0:0001 HBG4a2 partition 1 4.00 MiB
[ 2.249110] mmcblk0boot1: mmc0:0001 HBG4a2 partition 2 4.00 MiB
[ 2.255307] mmcblk0rpmb: mmc0:0001 HBG4a2 partition 3 4.00 MiB, chardev (248:0)
1. Non-packed request
1) Sequential read:
Speed: 59.2MiB/s, 60.4MiB/s, 63.6MiB/s, 60.3MiB/s, 59.9MiB/s
Average speed: 60.68MiB/s
2) Random read:
Speed: 31.3MiB/s, 31.4MiB/s, 31.5MiB/s, 31.3MiB/s, 31.3MiB/s
Average speed: 31.36MiB/s
3) Sequential write:
Speed: 71MiB/s, 71.8MiB/s, 72.3MiB/s, 72.2MiB/s, 71MiB/s
Average speed: 71.66MiB/s
4) Random write:
Speed: 68.9MiB/s, 68.7MiB/s, 68.8MiB/s, 68.6MiB/s, 68.8MiB/s
Average speed: 68.76MiB/s
2. Packed request
1) Sequential read:
Speed: 230MiB/s, 230MiB/s, 229MiB/s, 230MiB/s, 229MiB/s
Average speed: 229.6MiB/s
2) Random read:
Speed: 181MiB/s, 181MiB/s, 181MiB/s, 180MiB/s, 181MiB/s
Average speed: 180.8MiB/s
3) Sequential write:
Speed: 175MiB/s, 171MiB/s, 171MiB/s, 172MiB/s, 171MiB/s
Average speed: 172MiB/s
4) Random write:
Speed: 169MiB/s, 169MiB/s, 171MiB/s, 167MiB/s, 170MiB/s
Average speed: 169.2MiB/s
From above data, we can see the packed request can improve the performance
greatly. Any comments are welcome. Thanks a lot.
Changes from RFC v1:
- Re-implement the batch processing according to Ming's suggestion
- Remove the bd.last validation in MMC block.c, since we always get bd.last == false
according to the new batch processing method.
Baolin Wang (6):
mmc: Add MMC packed request support for MMC software queue
mmc: host: sdhci: Introduce ADMA3 transfer mode
mmc: host: sdhci: Factor out the command configuration
mmc: host: sdhci: Remove redundant sg_count member of struct
sdhci_host
mmc: host: sdhci: Add MMC packed request support
mmc: host: sdhci-sprd: Add MMC packed request support
Ming Lei (1):
block: Extand commit_rqs() to do batch processing
block/blk-mq-sched.c | 29 +-
block/blk-mq.c | 15 +-
drivers/mmc/core/block.c | 14 +
drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 26 ++
drivers/mmc/core/core.h | 2 +
drivers/mmc/core/queue.c | 19 +-
drivers/mmc/host/mmc_hsq.c | 292 +++++++++++++++++---
drivers/mmc/host/mmc_hsq.h | 25 +-
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-sprd.c | 30 +-
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 504 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h | 61 +++-
include/linux/blk-mq.h | 1 +
include/linux/mmc/core.h | 6 +
include/linux/mmc/host.h | 9 +
14 files changed, 900 insertions(+), 133 deletions(-)
--
2.17.1
next reply other threads:[~2020-04-26 9:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-26 9:38 Baolin Wang [this message]
2020-04-26 9:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/7] block: Extand commit_rqs() to do batch processing Baolin Wang
2020-04-27 15:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-28 8:02 ` Baolin Wang
2020-05-08 21:35 ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-05-08 21:46 ` Ming Lei
2020-05-08 22:19 ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-05-08 23:22 ` Ming Lei
2020-05-09 8:57 ` Baolin Wang
2020-05-09 9:43 ` Ming Lei
2020-05-10 7:44 ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-05-11 1:29 ` Ming Lei
2020-05-11 9:23 ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-05-11 11:47 ` Ming Lei
2020-05-12 6:26 ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-05-12 7:55 ` Ming Lei
2020-04-26 9:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/7] mmc: Add MMC packed request support for MMC software queue Baolin Wang
2020-04-26 9:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/7] mmc: host: sdhci: Introduce ADMA3 transfer mode Baolin Wang
2020-04-26 9:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/7] mmc: host: sdhci: Factor out the command configuration Baolin Wang
2020-04-26 9:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/7] mmc: host: sdhci: Remove redundant sg_count member of struct sdhci_host Baolin Wang
2020-04-26 9:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 6/7] mmc: host: sdhci: Add MMC packed request support Baolin Wang
2020-04-26 9:39 ` [RFC PATCH v2 7/7] mmc: host: sdhci-sprd: " Baolin Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1587888520.git.baolin.wang7@gmail.com \
--to=baolin.wang7@gmail.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=orsonzhai@gmail.com \
--cc=paolo.valente@linaro.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=zhang.lyra@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).