From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Vicente Bergas <vicencb@gmail.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mmc: core: don't set limits.discard_granularity as 0
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 10:13:10 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e1c558b6-f33f-a4d6-64fc-ba157d4dcb83@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201001065914.24526-1-colyli@suse.de>
On 1/10/20 9:59 am, Coly Li wrote:
> In mmc_queue_setup_discard() the mmc driver queue's discard_granularity
> might be set as 0 (when card->pref_erase > max_discard) while the mmc
> device still declares to support discard operation. This is buggy and
> triggered the following kernel warning message,
>
> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 135 at __blkdev_issue_discard+0x200/0x294
> CPU: 0 PID: 135 Comm: f2fs_discard-17 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6 #1
> Hardware name: Google Kevin (DT)
> pstate: 00000005 (nzcv daif -PAN -UAO BTYPE=--)
> pc : __blkdev_issue_discard+0x200/0x294
> lr : __blkdev_issue_discard+0x54/0x294
> sp : ffff800011dd3b10
> x29: ffff800011dd3b10 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: ffff800011dd3cc4 x26: ffff800011dd3e18 x25: 000000000004e69b x24: 0000000000000c40 x23: ffff0000f1deaaf0 x22: ffff0000f2849200 x21: 00000000002734d8 x20: 0000000000000008 x19: 0000000000000000 x18: 0000000000000000 x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000394 x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000 x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 00000000000008b0 x9 : ffff800011dd3cb0 x8 : 000000000004e69b x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : ffff0000f1926400 x5 : ffff0000f1940800 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000c40 x2 : 0000000000000008 x1 : 00000000002734d8 x0 : 0000000000000000 Call trace:
> __blkdev_issue_discard+0x200/0x294
> __submit_discard_cmd+0x128/0x374
> __issue_discard_cmd_orderly+0x188/0x244
> __issue_discard_cmd+0x2e8/0x33c
> issue_discard_thread+0xe8/0x2f0
> kthread+0x11c/0x120
> ret_from_fork+0x10/0x1c
> ---[ end trace e4c8023d33dfe77a ]---
>
> This patch fixes the issue by setting discard_granularity as SECTOR_SIZE
> instead of 0 when (card->pref_erase > max_discard) is true. Now no more
> complain from __blkdev_issue_discard() for the improper value of discard
> granularity.
>
> This issue is explored after commit b35fd7422c2f ("block: check queue's
explored -> exposed
> limits.discard_granularity in __blkdev_issue_discard()"), therefore add
> a "Fixes:" tag for the commit to make sure people won't miss this patch
> after applying the change of __blkdev_issue_discard().
>
> Fixes: b35fd7422c2f ("block: check queue's limits.discard_granularity in __blkdev_issue_discard()").
I thought you would keep the other fixes tag also
> Reported-by: Vicente Bergas <vicencb@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Otherwise:
Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
> ---
> Changelog,
> v2, change commit id of the Fixes tag.
> v1, initial version.
>
> drivers/mmc/core/queue.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/queue.c b/drivers/mmc/core/queue.c
> index 6c022ef0f84d..350d0cc4ee62 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/queue.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/queue.c
> @@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ static void mmc_queue_setup_discard(struct request_queue *q,
> q->limits.discard_granularity = card->pref_erase << 9;
> /* granularity must not be greater than max. discard */
> if (card->pref_erase > max_discard)
> - q->limits.discard_granularity = 0;
> + q->limits.discard_granularity = SECTOR_SIZE;
> if (mmc_can_secure_erase_trim(card))
> blk_queue_flag_set(QUEUE_FLAG_SECERASE, q);
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-01 7:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-01 6:59 [PATCH v2] mmc: core: don't set limits.discard_granularity as 0 Coly Li
2020-10-01 7:13 ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
2020-10-01 7:17 ` Coly Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e1c558b6-f33f-a4d6-64fc-ba157d4dcb83@intel.com \
--to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=colyli@suse.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=vicencb@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox