From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] mmc: sdhci-acpi: Add DMI based blacklist
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 10:56:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e85e4d96-698c-0c34-2fce-bdbd24528fed@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9e1aa5f3-b880-990c-2844-826afc91a45f@redhat.com>
Hi,
On 19-06-17 16:07, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 19-06-17 13:59, Adrian Hunter wrote:
<snip>
>>>> Perhaps there is something else we can match on, like the presence of the
>>>> PCIe wifi device since we only use SDIO for wifi. Can you send a copy of
>>>> the ACPI DSDT table, or an acpidump file. Also lspci output.
<snip>
>> Does this work?
>
> I'm happy to report that yes it does. If you prefer this solution
> then that is fine by me:
>
> Acked-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
> Tested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
So what is the plan moving forward with this ?
Yesterday I was running some tests on a GPD-win a friend recently bought and
I hit this issue again, my usb-disk with a test-install was running my solution
with the BIOS date check and that failed because his model had a new BIOS
build and thus a different date. So I believe that this patch is better
then mine as it won't break with BIOS updates and avoids us needing to
patch the quirk table all the time.
As such I would like to see us move forward with this patch and get it
merged for 4.13 (with a Cc stable) so that we can finally get this
regression fixed.
Adrian, can you do an official submission of this patch (with my ack
and tested-by) so that Ulf can merge this ?
Regards,
Hans
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c
>> index cf66a3db71b8..ac678e9fb19a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c
>> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
>> #include <asm/cpu_device_id.h>
>> #include <asm/intel-family.h>
>> #include <asm/iosf_mbi.h>
>> +#include <linux/pci.h>
>> #endif
>> #include "sdhci.h"
>> @@ -134,6 +135,16 @@ static bool sdhci_acpi_byt(void)
>> return x86_match_cpu(byt);
>> }
>> +static bool sdhci_acpi_cht(void)
>> +{
>> + static const struct x86_cpu_id cht[] = {
>> + { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_AIRMONT },
>> + {}
>> + };
>> +
>> + return x86_match_cpu(cht);
>> +}
>> +
>> #define BYT_IOSF_SCCEP 0x63
>> #define BYT_IOSF_OCP_NETCTRL0 0x1078
>> #define BYT_IOSF_OCP_TIMEOUT_BASE GENMASK(10, 8)
>> @@ -178,6 +189,45 @@ static bool sdhci_acpi_byt_defer(struct device *dev)
>> return false;
>> }
>> +static bool sdhci_acpi_cht_pci_wifi(unsigned int vendor, unsigned int device,
>> + unsigned int slot, unsigned int parent_slot)
>> +{
>> + struct pci_dev *dev, *parent, *from = NULL;
>> +
>> + while (1) {
>> + dev = pci_get_device(vendor, device, from);
>> + pci_dev_put(from);
>> + if (!dev)
>> + break;
>> + parent = pci_upstream_bridge(dev);
>> + if (ACPI_COMPANION(&dev->dev) && PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn) == slot &&
>> + parent && PCI_SLOT(parent->devfn) == parent_slot &&
>> + !pci_upstream_bridge(parent)) {
>> + pci_dev_put(dev);
>> + return true;
>> + }
>> + from = dev;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * GPDwin uses PCI wifi which conflicts with SDIO's use of
>> + * acpi_device_fix_up_power() on child device nodes. Identifying GPDwin is
>> + * problematic, but since SDIO is only used for wifi, the presence of the PCI
>> + * wifi card in the expected slot with an ACPI companion node, is used to
>> + * indicate that acpi_device_fix_up_power() should be avoided.
>> + */
>> +static inline bool sdhci_acpi_no_fixup_child_power(const char *hid,
>> + const char *uid)
>> +{
>> + return sdhci_acpi_cht() &&
>> + !strcmp(hid, "80860F14") &&
>> + !strcmp(uid, "2") &&
>> + sdhci_acpi_cht_pci_wifi(0x14e4, 0x43ec, 0, 28);
>> +}
>> +
>> #else
>> static inline void sdhci_acpi_byt_setting(struct device *dev)
>> @@ -189,6 +239,12 @@ static inline bool sdhci_acpi_byt_defer(struct device *dev)
>> return false;
>> }
>> +static inline bool sdhci_acpi_no_fixup_child_power(const char *hid,
>> + const char *uid)
>> +{
>> + return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> #endif
>> static int bxt_get_cd(struct mmc_host *mmc)
>> @@ -389,18 +445,20 @@ static int sdhci_acpi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> if (acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &device))
>> return -ENODEV;
>> + hid = acpi_device_hid(device);
>> + uid = device->pnp.unique_id;
>> +
>> /* Power on the SDHCI controller and its children */
>> acpi_device_fix_up_power(device);
>> - list_for_each_entry(child, &device->children, node)
>> - if (child->status.present && child->status.enabled)
>> - acpi_device_fix_up_power(child);
>> + if (!sdhci_acpi_no_fixup_child_power(hid, uid)) {
>> + list_for_each_entry(child, &device->children, node)
>> + if (child->status.present && child->status.enabled)
>> + acpi_device_fix_up_power(child);
>> + }
>> if (sdhci_acpi_byt_defer(dev))
>> return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>> - hid = acpi_device_hid(device);
>> - uid = device->pnp.unique_id;
>> -
>> iomem = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>> if (!iomem)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-21 8:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-08 18:54 [PATCH v4 1/2] mmc: sdhci-acpi: Add blacklist module option Hans de Goede
2017-06-08 18:55 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] mmc: sdhci-acpi: Add DMI based blacklist Hans de Goede
2017-06-12 12:11 ` Adrian Hunter
2017-06-12 13:27 ` Hans de Goede
2017-06-14 7:43 ` Adrian Hunter
2017-06-14 13:20 ` Hans de Goede
2017-06-16 12:33 ` Hans de Goede
2017-06-16 12:34 ` Adrian Hunter
2017-06-16 14:37 ` Hans de Goede
2017-06-19 11:59 ` Adrian Hunter
2017-06-19 14:07 ` Hans de Goede
2017-06-21 8:56 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2017-06-12 12:04 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] mmc: sdhci-acpi: Add blacklist module option Adrian Hunter
2017-06-13 7:30 ` Hans de Goede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e85e4d96-698c-0c34-2fce-bdbd24528fed@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox