From: merez@codeaurora.org
To: Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@samsung.com>
Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, 'Chris Ball' <cjb@laptop.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] mmc: core: Support packed command for eMMC4.5 device
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 01:36:52 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fd4b8ef9df0d19e20c07923077937231.squirrel@www.codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000b01ccdc0a$0336abc0$09a40340$%jun@samsung.com>
> @@ -1065,12 +1075,60 @@ static int mmc_blk_err_check(struct mmc_card
> *card,
>  	if (!brq->data.bytes_xfered)
>  		return MMC_BLK_RETRY;
>
> +	if (mq_mrq->packed_cmd != MMC_PACKED_NONE) {
> +		if (unlikely(brq->data.blocks << 9 != brq->data.bytes_xfered))
> +			return MMC_BLK_PARTIAL;
> +		else
> +			return MMC_BLK_SUCCESS;
> +	}
> +
>  	if (blk_rq_bytes(req) != brq->data.bytes_xfered)
>  		return MMC_BLK_PARTIAL;
>
>  	return MMC_BLK_SUCCESS;
>  }
I think it would be best to keep the request length (brq->data.blocks << 9
or blk_rq_bytes(req)) in a variable and use it in the original if above.
This way you can avoid doubling the exit points from the function.
Thanks,
Maya Erez
Consultant for Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum
next prev parent reply	other threads:[~2012-02-15  9:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-26  9:08 [PATCH v4 2/2] mmc: core: Support packed command for eMMC4.5 device Seungwon Jeon
2012-01-26  9:37 ` Namjae Jeon
2012-02-15  7:12   ` merez
2012-02-15  9:41     ` Seungwon Jeon
2012-02-15  9:36 ` merez [this message]
2012-02-16  0:09   ` Seungwon Jeon
2012-02-20 21:22 ` merez
2012-02-21  2:08   ` Namjae Jeon
2012-02-21  5:35   ` Seungwon Jeon
2012-02-21 19:02     ` merez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox
  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):
  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fd4b8ef9df0d19e20c07923077937231.squirrel@www.codeaurora.org \
    --to=merez@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=cjb@laptop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tgih.jun@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY
  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
  Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
  before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).