From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Ball Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: Added quirks for Ricoh 1180:e823 lower base clock frequency Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 12:55:17 -0400 Message-ID: References: <1310419715-13254-1-git-send-email-manoj.iyer@canonical.com> <201107131835.25217.arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: In-Reply-To: (Manoj Iyer's message of "Wed, 13 Jul 2011 11:46:27 -0500 (CDT)") Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Manoj Iyer Cc: Arnd Bergmann , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org, matsumur@nts.ricoh.co.jp, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Wed, Jul 13 2011, Manoj Iyer wrote: > Do you think that lowering the controller speed to 50Mhz in case we > have a failure is a better idea than reducing the speed for all e823 > ricoh controllers? I can send a V2 of the patch. What do you think ? It could be better. Do you think you could get hold of a UHS-1 card for testing with? (I don't think it's worth doing if there's no appreciable performance difference either way.) Thanks, - Chris. -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child