From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Ball Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] mmc: atmel rework for next Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 13:03:47 -0400 Message-ID: References: <4E4A8E73.7050705@atmel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from void.printf.net ([89.145.121.20]:39750 "EHLO void.printf.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751697Ab1HSREO (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Aug 2011 13:04:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4E4A8E73.7050705@atmel.com> (Nicolas Ferre's message of "Tue, 16 Aug 2011 17:36:19 +0200") Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Nicolas Ferre Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, "'linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org'" , Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD , Ludovic Desroches , Linux Kernel list Hi, On Tue, Aug 16 2011, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > Hi Chris, > > Please pull from: > > git://github.com/at91linux/linux-2.6-at91.git nfe/mmc_atmel > > This is a series that reworks the atmel-mci driver for a future merge of both at91_mci and atmel-mci drivers. Those patches have been discussed on the mailing-list. > I added a tiny at91_mci patch also sent last week. Thanks, all looks good -- pushed to mmc-next with some commit message rewording. Please wrap your commit messages to 75 cols in future, so that they're viewable in "git log" without wrapping. I'll repeat your warning text from one of the commit messages here for the broader audience: Warning: at91rm9200 is not supported, to support it we need to use swab32 on data but I have no board to test it. - Chris. -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child