From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Ball Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mmc: sdhci-esdhc: Change delay after setting clock from 100ms to 1ms Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 12:25:48 -0500 Message-ID: References: <1321944150-12162-1-git-send-email-tony.lin@freescale.com> <87vcq0kvs6.fsf@laptop.org> <97D3A72708D04647A5AC84A04996E5B526EC0F@039-SN1MPN1-001.039d.mgd.msft.net> <8A2FC72B45BB5A4C9F801431E06AE48F1162FCA2@039-SN1MPN1-005.039d.mgd.msft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from void.printf.net ([89.145.121.20]:49189 "EHLO void.printf.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753553Ab1LMRZ7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Dec 2011 12:25:59 -0500 In-Reply-To: <8A2FC72B45BB5A4C9F801431E06AE48F1162FCA2@039-SN1MPN1-005.039d.mgd.msft.net> (Huang Changming-R's message of "Fri, 2 Dec 2011 07:13:31 +0000") Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Huang Changming-R66093 Cc: Lin Tony-B19295 , "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Xie Xiaobo-R63061 , "avorontsov@ru.mvista.com" Hi, On Fri, Dec 02 2011, Huang Changming-R66093 wrote: > I don't think it make sense to change the delay time. > Which will affect all PowerPC eSDHC controller, could you confirm > which can work on all PowerPC platform? No, of course not, but that's why I said we can put the patch in mmc-next and see if anyone complains; mdelay(100) is clearly broken. Thanks, - Chris. -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child