Re: [PATCH 04/27] ARM: pxa: drop pxa310/pxa320/pxa93x support

[Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>]

"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de> writes:

> Hi Robert,
Hi Arnd,

> Thanks for pointing this out, I thought that I had caught
> all the missing dependencies ones after you pointed out
> the AC97_BUS_NEW that I fixed in patch 14.
Sorry I've not seen this one in my previous review.

> From what I can tell, commit b5aaaa666a85 ("ARM: pxa: add
> Kconfig dependencies for ATAGS based boards"), the
> PXA310/PXA320 DT support became dead code because
> MACH_PXA3XX_DT only selects CPU_PXA300, so if it worked
> before that commit, it now needs CONFIG_UNUSED_BOARD_FILES
> and CONFIG_EXPERT as well as enabling one of the legacy
> board files with the corresponding chip support.
>
> If that's all you think is missing, I can add this
> trivial patch as well and rework the series to not
> drop code that depends on PXA310/PXA320:
Yes, that would be great !

> Can you have a look at the other patches to see if there
> are more removed drivers or platform bits that are currently
> dead code but are actually required?
Yes, I've been through your whole serie and that's the
last thing I have identified. I've read carefully all the
patches now, and the whole serie looks good to me.

So with this patch and keeping the clocks and cpufreq
parts for pxa3*0, you can add everywhere my :

Acked-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>

Cheers.

--
Robert