From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Ball Subject: Re: [PATCH] SD/MMC: fix the issue of SDHC performance regression Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 08:37:41 -0500 Message-ID: References: <1320658589-13143-1-git-send-email-b32616@freescale.com> <20111108094734.GA1592@ladygaga> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from void.printf.net ([89.145.121.20]:35943 "EHLO void.printf.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751927Ab1KHNiA (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Nov 2011 08:38:00 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20111108094734.GA1592@ladygaga> (Aaron Lu's message of "Tue, 8 Nov 2011 17:47:36 +0800") Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Aaron Lu Cc: Qiang Liu , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, leoli@freescale.com, kumar.gala@freescale.com, subhashj@codeaurora.org Hi, On Tue, Nov 08 2011, Aaron Lu wrote: > SDR25 is also 50MHZ, the same frequency as high speed. > Or we can add a new macro for high speed like qiang has done, > which one you prefer? The new macro makes most sense to me -- if no-one disagrees, I'll convert Liu's patch into a rename patch and queue it as a cleanup for 3.2. Thanks! - Chris. -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child