From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Ball Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Extend sdhci-esdhc-imx card_detect and write_protect support for mx5 Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 19:06:54 -0400 Message-ID: References: <1308667311-1855-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <20110627013826.GB21415@S2100-06.ap.freescale.net> <20110627042345.GA21757@S2100-06.ap.freescale.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from void.printf.net ([89.145.121.20]:35189 "EHLO void.printf.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757657Ab1GAXHT (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jul 2011 19:07:19 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20110627042345.GA21757@S2100-06.ap.freescale.net> (Shawn Guo's message of "Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:23:46 +0800") Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Shawn Guo Cc: patches@linaro.org, Sascha Hauer , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Wolfram Sang , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Eric Benard , Philip Rakity , Arnaud Patard Hi, On Mon, Jun 27 2011, Shawn Guo wrote: >> I'll need to rebase mmc-next onto linux-next before I can merge it, >> because the mach-imx/ board files you're modifying do not exist in >> Linus' tree. (I don't mind doing that, but it might be easier if >> you had the ARM patches go in via a different tree instead.) > > I can ask Sascha to pick up patch #4 with your ack. But the problem > is patch #4 has to work with #1 applied first, otherwise the CD > interrupt storm will freeze the system. Let's do that, please. I've merged #1-#3 to mmc-next, and for #4: Acked-by: Chris Ball (Sascha, please note that you'll have to send #4 to Linus after I send the MMC pull request, as Shawn explains above.) Thanks, - Chris. -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child