From: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
To: Girish K S <girish.shivananjappa@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, kgene.kim@samsung.com,
patches@linaro.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 RESEND 2/2] mmc: core: Add Poweroff Notify handling eMMC 4.5
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 19:09:17 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2obxola02.fsf@bob.laptop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1316180377-30969-3-git-send-email-girish.shivananjappa@linaro.org> (Girish K. S.'s message of "Fri, 16 Sep 2011 19:09:37 +0530")
Hi Girish,
On Fri, Sep 16 2011, Girish K S wrote:
> This patch adds the power off notification handling
> during suspend and system poweroff.
> For suspend mode short timeout is used, whereas for the
> normal poweroff long timeout is used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Girish K S <girish.shivananjappa@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c | 5 ++++-
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 10 ++++++++++
> include/linux/mmc/card.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/mmc/host.h | 4 ++++
> 5 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> index 91a0a74..157060f 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> @@ -1130,9 +1130,41 @@ static void mmc_power_up(struct mmc_host *host)
>
> static void mmc_power_off(struct mmc_host *host)
> {
> + struct mmc_card *card = host->card;
> + unsigned int notify_type;
> + unsigned int timeout;
> + int err;
> +
> host->ios.clock = 0;
> host->ios.vdd = 0;
>
> + if (card != NULL && mmc_card_mmc(card) &&
> + (mmc_card_powernotify_on(card))) {
> +
> + if (host->power_notify_type == MMC_HOST_PW_NOTIFY_SHORT) {
> + notify_type = EXT_CSD_POWER_OFF_SHORT;
> + timeout = card->ext_csd.generic_cmd6_time;
> + mmc_card_set_powernotify_short(card);
> + } else {
> + notify_type = EXT_CSD_POWER_OFF_LONG;
> + timeout = card->ext_csd.power_off_longtime;
> + mmc_card_set_powernotify_long(card);
> + }
> +
> + err = mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL,
> + EXT_CSD_POWER_OFF_NOTIFICATION,
> + notify_type, timeout);
> +
> + if (err && err != -EBADMSG)
> + printk(KERN_ERR "Device failed to respond "
> + "within %d poweroff time."
> + "forcefully powering down"
> + "the device\n", timeout);
You don't have any space between ".f" in the message. I suggest:
pr_err("Device failed to respond within %d poweroff "
"time. Forcefully powering down the device\n",
timeout);
> +
> + /*Set the card state to no notification after the poweroff*/
A space between /* */.
> + mmc_card_set_powernotify_off(card);
> + }
> +
> /*
> * Reset ocr mask to be the highest possible voltage supported for
> * this mmc host. This value will be used at next power up.
> @@ -2022,6 +2054,7 @@ int mmc_pm_notify(struct notifier_block *notify_block,
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
> host->rescan_disable = 1;
> + host->power_notify_type = MMC_HOST_PW_NOTIFY_SHORT;
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
> cancel_delayed_work_sync(&host->detect);
>
> @@ -2044,6 +2077,7 @@ int mmc_pm_notify(struct notifier_block *notify_block,
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
> host->rescan_disable = 0;
> + host->power_notify_type = MMC_HOST_PW_NOTIFY_LONG;
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
> mmc_detect_change(host, 0);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
> index 2f06b37..63cc77b 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
> @@ -715,7 +715,8 @@ static int mmc_init_card(struct mmc_host *host, u32 ocr,
> * If the host supports the power_off_notify capability then
> * set the notification byte in the ext_csd register of device
> */
> - if (host->caps & MMC_CAP_POWER_OFF_NOTIFY) {
> + if ((host->caps & MMC_CAP_POWER_OFF_NOTIFY) &&
The && is indented weirdly. Just use a space between ") &&".
> + (mmc_card_powernotify_off(card))) {
> err = mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL,
> EXT_CSD_POWER_OFF_NOTIFICATION,
> EXT_CSD_POWER_ON,
> @@ -724,6 +725,8 @@ static int mmc_init_card(struct mmc_host *host, u32 ocr,
> goto free_card;
> }
>
> + if (!err)
> + mmc_card_set_powernotify_on(card);
Extra newline needed here, as there was before you added these two lines.
> /*
> * Activate high speed (if supported)
> */
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> index 0e02cc1..92ea734 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> @@ -2566,6 +2566,16 @@ int sdhci_add_host(struct sdhci_host *host)
> if (caps[1] & SDHCI_DRIVER_TYPE_D)
> mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_DRIVER_TYPE_D;
>
> + /*
> + * If Notify capability is enabled and
> + * notify type is not initialised by host, set default to
> + * long power off notify timeout value
> + */
> + if (mmc->caps & MMC_CAP_POWER_OFF_NOTIFY)
> + mmc->power_notify_type = MMC_HOST_PW_NOTIFY_SHORT;
> + else
> + mmc->power_notify_type = MMC_HOST_PW_NOTIFY_NONE;
> +
The comment says it sets the default to long power off if power_notify_type
is unset, but the code sets power_notify_type to short power off regardless
of whether power_notify_type was set. The comment and code should agree.
> /* Initial value for re-tuning timer count */
> host->tuning_count = (caps[1] & SDHCI_RETUNING_TIMER_COUNT_MASK) >>
> SDHCI_RETUNING_TIMER_COUNT_SHIFT;
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/card.h b/include/linux/mmc/card.h
> index 2bf2843..1d6a832 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmc/card.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmc/card.h
> @@ -190,6 +190,11 @@ struct mmc_card {
> #define MMC_QUIRK_DISABLE_CD (1<<5) /* disconnect CD/DAT[3] resistor */
> #define MMC_QUIRK_INAND_CMD38 (1<<6) /* iNAND devices have broken CMD38 */
> #define MMC_QUIRK_BLK_NO_CMD23 (1<<7) /* Avoid CMD23 for regular multiblock */
> + unsigned int poweroff_notify_state;/*eMMC4.5 notify feature */
> +#define MMC_NO_POWER_NOTIFICATION 0
> +#define MMC_POWERED_ON 1
> +#define MMC_POWEROFF_SHORT 2
> +#define MMC_POWEROFF_LONG 3
>
> unsigned int erase_size; /* erase size in sectors */
> unsigned int erase_shift; /* if erase unit is power 2 */
> @@ -325,6 +330,20 @@ static inline void __maybe_unused remove_quirk(struct mmc_card *card, int data)
> #define mmc_sd_card_set_uhs(c) ((c)->state |= MMC_STATE_ULTRAHIGHSPEED)
> #define mmc_card_set_ext_capacity(c) ((c)->state |= MMC_CARD_SDXC)
>
> +#define mmc_card_powernotify_on(c) \
> + ((c)->poweroff_notify_state == MMC_POWERED_ON)
> +#define mmc_card_powernotify_off(c) \
> + ((c)->poweroff_notify_state == MMC_NO_POWER_NOTIFICATION)
> +
> +#define mmc_card_set_powernotify_off(c) \
> + ((c)->poweroff_notify_state = MMC_NO_POWER_NOTIFICATION)
> +#define mmc_card_set_powernotify_on(c) \
> + ((c)->poweroff_notify_state = MMC_POWERED_ON)
> +#define mmc_card_set_powernotify_short(c) \
> + ((c)->poweroff_notify_state = MMC_POWEROFF_SHORT)
> +#define mmc_card_set_powernotify_long(c) \
> + ((c)->poweroff_notify_state = MMC_POWEROFF_LONG)
> +
I don't think these macros need to exist. You can already do the same
thing in one line of code, and it would be clearer to be modifying/testing
poweroff_notify_state directly. The only case where it might save enough
column space to allow fitting everything on one line is for
MMC_NO_POWER_NOTIFICATION, but maybe that's just a sign that this
#define should be made shorter somehow.
Thanks! Please could you rebase against mmc-next, fix, and resend?
- Chris.
--
Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-10 23:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-16 13:39 [PATCH V6 RESEND 0/2] Poweroff Notify eMMC 4.5 Girish K S
2011-09-16 13:39 ` [PATCH V6 RESEND 1/2] mmc: core: Add power off notify feature(eMMC 4.5) Girish K S
2011-09-16 13:39 ` [PATCH V6 RESEND 2/2] mmc: core: Add Poweroff Notify handling eMMC 4.5 Girish K S
2011-10-10 23:09 ` Chris Ball [this message]
2011-10-11 4:59 ` Girish K S
2011-10-11 14:00 ` Chris Ball
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m2obxola02.fsf@bob.laptop.org \
--to=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=girish.shivananjappa@linaro.org \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox