From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Ball Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] mmc: tmio: two bug-fixes Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 15:27:03 -0400 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from void.printf.net ([89.145.121.20]:51652 "EHLO void.printf.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752804Ab1GNT1y (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jul 2011 15:27:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Guennadi Liakhovetski's message of "Thu, 14 Jul 2011 18:39:02 +0200 (CEST)") Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Guennadi Liakhovetski Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Magnus Damm , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Ian Molton , Simon Horman Hi Guennadi, On Thu, Jul 14 2011, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > There go two more bug-fixes for tmio on top of my earlier patches from > today, so, should still be easy enough to trace. So, to pull them > together, the previous ones were > > [PATCH v3] mmc: tmio: fix recursive spinlock, don't schedule with > interrupts disabled > [PATCH v3] mmc: tmio: maximize power saving > > And now follow > > [PATCH 1/2] mmc: tmio: fix a recently introduced bug in DMA code > [PATCH 2/2] mmc: tmio: fix a deadlock Pushed these four plus "mmc: sh_mmcif: maximize power saving" to mmc-next for 3.1. Thanks! By the way, feel free to send me a MAINTAINERS update taking over TMIO if you'd like to; you've been doing the work. :-) - Chris. -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child