From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Ball Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] ESDHC: Workaround for data crc error on p1010rdb Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 23:28:26 -0500 Message-ID: References: <1328688356-17510-1-git-send-email-r66093@freescale.com> <110EED8CC96DFC488B7E717A2027A27C01F304@039-SN1MPN1-002.039d.mgd.msft.net> <110EED8CC96DFC488B7E717A2027A27C021A89@039-SN1MPN1-002.039d.mgd.msft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from void.printf.net ([89.145.121.20]:35958 "EHLO void.printf.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755199Ab2BME2k (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Feb 2012 23:28:40 -0500 In-Reply-To: <110EED8CC96DFC488B7E717A2027A27C021A89@039-SN1MPN1-002.039d.mgd.msft.net> (Huang Changming-R's message of "Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:40:07 +0000") Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Huang Changming-R66093 Cc: "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" , Jain Priyanka-B32167 Hi, On Sun, Feb 12 2012, Huang Changming-R66093 wrote: > You are right. > I want to use the below code in header file "drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc.h": > if (of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "fsl,p1010-esdhc")) > then I can avoid the twice test of the clock. > do you think if it is reasonable? Yes, I think that's okay; let's try it. Thanks, - Chris. -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child