From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Ball Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] ARM: mach-shmobile: ag5evm: SDHI requires waiting for idle Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:37:56 -0400 Message-ID: References: <1308610812-3479-1-git-send-email-horms@verge.net.au> <1308610812-3479-6-git-send-email-horms@verge.net.au> <20110621162735.GL7920@linux-sh.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110621162735.GL7920@linux-sh.org> (Paul Mundt's message of "Wed, 22 Jun 2011 01:27:36 +0900") Sender: linux-sh-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Paul Mundt Cc: Simon Horman , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Magnus Damm , Guennadi Liakhovetski List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Tue, Jun 21 2011, Paul Mundt wrote: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:10:22PM -0400, Chris Ball wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 20 2011, Simon Horman wrote: >> > Dependencies: >> > "mmc: sdhi: Add write16_hook" >> > "ARM: mach-shmobile: ag5evm: consistently name sdhi info structures" >> >> Could I get your ACK for this one, so that I can merge patches 1/2/3/5 >> together via the MMC tree? >> > Well, this has a dependency on 4/5 which I've already applied. I was > simply going to wait for 1-3 to be merged via your tree and then roll in > this last one on top of that. If you want to take them all that's ok too, > git should be able to deal with any merge conflicts fine. Ah, okay -- I've pushed 1-3 now to mmc-next for 3.1, you can take 4-5. (I was thinking I should try to avoid requiring you to wait for Linus to pull MMC before you can send sh to him.) - Chris. -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child