From: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
To: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kyungmin.park@samsung.com,
jy0922.shim@samsung.com, kgene.kim@samsung.com,
thomas.abraham@linaro.org, Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] mmc: host: sdhci-s3c: Add broken-voltage DT property for broken voltage quirk
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 06:24:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3a9wmgvip.fsf@pullcord.laptop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1587150.uFGRdL0s8e@amdc1227> (Tomasz Figa's message of "Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:13:14 +0200")
Hi Tomasz,
On Wed, Sep 19 2012, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On Wednesday 19 of September 2012 01:42:01 Chris Ball wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 04 2012, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>> > Some boards use fixed voltage regulator for vmmc supply (e.g. for eMMC
>> > memories). MMC_CAP2_BROKEN_VOLTAGE must be enabled for them to operate
>> > correctly.
>>>
>> Is there a reason we can't make this a property on the regulator instead?
>
> Is there a reason we can't make this a property of the mmc subsystem? ;)
>
> Now, seriously, could you elaborate on this a bit more? Do you mean that a
> regulator should provide a dummy set voltage operation that would accept
> any voltage?
Sorry for the terseness.
It seems like we're encoding exactly the same information twice in two
different subsystems -- I don't see the point, so I'd like to think
about how we could do better.
For example, if we're only concerned about fixed regulators, could we
just detect a fixed regulator in the driver and avoid the failing call
to regulator_set_voltage() directly, without needing to go via this
capability? Seems like the capability doesn't tell us anything we
couldn't already have known.
Thanks,
- Chris.
--
Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-19 10:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1346748609-11115-1-git-send-email-t.figa@samsung.com>
2012-09-04 8:50 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] mmc: host: sdhci-s3c: Add broken-voltage DT property for broken voltage quirk Tomasz Figa
2012-09-05 8:36 ` Jaehoon Chung
2012-09-19 5:42 ` Chris Ball
2012-09-19 10:13 ` Tomasz Figa
2012-09-19 10:24 ` Chris Ball [this message]
2012-09-19 10:34 ` Tomasz Figa
2012-09-19 10:47 ` Chris Ball
2012-09-19 10:49 ` Tomasz Figa
2012-09-19 11:02 ` Jaehoon Chung
2012-09-19 14:39 ` Chris Ball
2012-09-20 5:57 ` Jaehoon Chung
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3a9wmgvip.fsf@pullcord.laptop.org \
--to=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=jy0922.shim@samsung.com \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=t.figa@samsung.com \
--cc=thomas.abraham@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox