From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Ball Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: change CONFIG of MMC_SDHCI based drivers from 'bool' to 'tristate' Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:57:06 -0400 Message-ID: References: <1300114465-3769-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@freescale.com> <20110328143806.GC18721@S2100-06.ap.freescale.net> <4D935E59.2020908@metafoo.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from void.printf.net ([89.145.121.20]:49946 "EHLO void.printf.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932747Ab1C3QvR (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:51:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4D935E59.2020908@metafoo.de> (Lars-Peter Clausen's message of "Wed, 30 Mar 2011 18:46:17 +0200") Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Lars-Peter Clausen Cc: Shawn Guo , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Hi Lars, On Wed, Mar 30 2011, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > That patch doesn't make much sense. The config options are used to decide > whether support for that platform should be build into the sdhci-platform or > sdhci-of module. So setting them 'm' doesn't make any sense, since you can't > build part of an module as a module. The effect for 'm' will probably be the > same as for 'n'. Thanks, makes sense -- I'll drop the patch. - Chris. -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child