From: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
To: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
Cc: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kyungmin.park@samsung.com,
jy0922.shim@samsung.com, kgene.kim@samsung.com,
thomas.abraham@linaro.org, Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] mmc: host: sdhci-s3c: Add broken-voltage DT property for broken voltage quirk
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 10:39:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3wqzqf557.fsf@pullcord.laptop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5059A64D.6000700@samsung.com> (Jaehoon Chung's message of "Wed, 19 Sep 2012 20:02:37 +0900")
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 19 2012, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 19 2012, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>>> We could just check if the regulator provides the capability to change the
>>> voltage.
>>>
>>> I don't see any direct way of querying the regulator for provided
>>> capabilities (correct me if I'm just blind), but calling
>>> regulator_count_voltages() on the regulator and checking if the returned
>>> value is 1 should be enough to assume that the regulator is fixed.
>>
>> Sounds good, I agree. Are you able to test that the obvious patch below
>> works on your fixed-regulator board?
>>
>> Jaehoon and Adrian, can you think of any reason why we shouldn't replace
>> MMC_CAP2_BROKEN_VOLTAGE with the regulator_count_voltages() call below?
>> Thanks.
>
> I think this is better than using MMC_CAP2_BROKEN_VOLTAGE.
> I tested with this..and working fine.
Great, here's the patch. Jaehoon, once this is merged, maybe you could
help remove the uses of MMC_CAP2_BROKEN_VOLTAGE from arch/arm/mach-exynos
and arch/arm/mach-s5pv210 now that they're no longer needed?
Thanks,
- Chris.
Subject: [PATCH] mmc: core: Replace MMC_CAP2_BROKEN_VOLTAGE with test for fixed regulator
Before this patch, we were using MMC_CAP2_BROKEN_VOLTAGE as a way to
avoid calling regulator_set_voltage() on a fixed regulator, but that's
just duplicating information that already exists -- we should test
whether the regulator is fixed directly, instead of via a capability.
This patch implements that test. We can't reclaim the capability bit
just yet, since there are still boards in arch/arm/ that reference it;
those references can be removed now.
Reported-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
---
drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 10 ++++++----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
index 044cd01..6612163 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
@@ -1113,7 +1113,8 @@ int mmc_regulator_set_ocr(struct mmc_host *mmc,
int tmp;
int voltage;
- /* REVISIT mmc_vddrange_to_ocrmask() may have set some
+ /*
+ * REVISIT mmc_vddrange_to_ocrmask() may have set some
* bits this regulator doesn't quite support ... don't
* be too picky, most cards and regulators are OK with
* a 0.1V range goof (it's a small error percentage).
@@ -1127,12 +1128,13 @@ int mmc_regulator_set_ocr(struct mmc_host *mmc,
max_uV = min_uV + 100 * 1000;
}
- /* avoid needless changes to this voltage; the regulator
- * might not allow this operation
+ /*
+ * If we're using a fixed/static regulator, don't call
+ * regulator_set_voltage; it would fail.
*/
voltage = regulator_get_voltage(supply);
- if (mmc->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_BROKEN_VOLTAGE)
+ if (regulator_count_voltages(supply) == 1)
min_uV = max_uV = voltage;
if (voltage < 0)
--
Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-19 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1346748609-11115-1-git-send-email-t.figa@samsung.com>
2012-09-04 8:50 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] mmc: host: sdhci-s3c: Add broken-voltage DT property for broken voltage quirk Tomasz Figa
2012-09-05 8:36 ` Jaehoon Chung
2012-09-19 5:42 ` Chris Ball
2012-09-19 10:13 ` Tomasz Figa
2012-09-19 10:24 ` Chris Ball
2012-09-19 10:34 ` Tomasz Figa
2012-09-19 10:47 ` Chris Ball
2012-09-19 10:49 ` Tomasz Figa
2012-09-19 11:02 ` Jaehoon Chung
2012-09-19 14:39 ` Chris Ball [this message]
2012-09-20 5:57 ` Jaehoon Chung
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3wqzqf557.fsf@pullcord.laptop.org \
--to=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
--cc=jy0922.shim@samsung.com \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=t.figa@samsung.com \
--cc=thomas.abraham@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox