From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Mike Frysinger To: Lucas De Marchi Subject: Re: Drop support to compressed modules? Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 14:08:21 -0400 Cc: LKML , "linux-modules" , Lucas De Marchi , Kay Sievers , Dave Reisner References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart49942458.lN5JY5jTRy"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Message-Id: <201209221408.23355.vapier@gentoo.org> List-ID: --nextPart49942458.lN5JY5jTRy Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Friday 21 September 2012 17:41:44 Lucas De Marchi wrote: > I'd like to ask people the following question: why are you using > compressed modules? Is it only for the disk space or is there any > performance related reason? i've only seen it to save on disk space -mike --nextPart49942458.lN5JY5jTRy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJQXf6XAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBOCEP/0qNKJIRqJrNVqgscGO9IAjW geNdIkiH8/DEXsi3S+0CJiSl6O+TqQo/S4pjIXXQnQ9cFXFNVxuDx+fl7QEQMrdB DwZ4BWK08TAvNUQnHUxRoazS+7eKEc6MKeiTbOKvoMnAR+E8Z4+i//k61yvHT0rI 9pgtkIQJCXTaWmFMtYJ3Lq+eFtN8b7zSqLYvfGGRD4VXfmQHAaJoQrze2FdtHADp bkFsDJ92n9Vwiv5Avg8AMW4kbuW3MCi8lEjSqZOG0+2Q/9TK/48vWNjjeUQDvj20 wA+FP4XMp4O5rjQ1fvLJ1Do6eQU4D9p2CI/m80wZJu9KrkZFddnEkgu1EywiO5Kt 17HCJHTbcOuTfeB8UnIWllVGcUVZKvXvp+zqGG3yQ4NsSfx1gbuc03d2vij6kIAG FffRDG+6OgcCFRcLQ+ibmkYCKw3OTbyWQbUNAaagjwMvLBJdetWWVkb01hSbDH2+ r3SRSOXiNIRVuNBiJtv7eMWLsLsoZo/3kPGXh0vlZT+nEIS8wXj3iJgBjF+ZgIpt kCsjNOmoZ8BAUsJvRzkEBOcsAoAg9X6qLgbqoTghdl5lNmiDgd2IQe0x8t6jCA2J ijGHiAV5frkKTtx8kflhvr+xhpiURWo6mpKgMLHoikdDxzZZkEayGsrPxSEX2ul8 EX5UAJnZfWmzfoo6XrD1 =7Rv/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart49942458.lN5JY5jTRy--