From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:47027 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751423AbaDALS7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Apr 2014 07:18:59 -0400 Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 08:18:54 -0300 From: Lucas De Marchi To: Michal Marek CC: , Tom Gundersen Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] config: also parse softdeps from modules Message-ID: <20140401111854.GK1123@intel.com> References: <1396271931-7431-1-git-send-email-mmarek@suse.cz> <1396271931-7431-2-git-send-email-mmarek@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" In-Reply-To: <1396271931-7431-2-git-send-email-mmarek@suse.cz> Sender: linux-modules-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Michal and Tom. On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 03:18:51PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote: > From: Tom Gundersen > > This information can be found in /lib/modules/`uname -r`/modules.softdep, and > has only recently been exported by the kernel. > > Also remove the advice about copying modules.softdep to /lib/modules as it is > not clear how to do this correctly with several kernels installed with > potentially conflicting soft dependencies. > --- I think in most of the cases using a softdep from the kernel is wrong, since there are other better ways to do it. But there are some it's indeed difficult to avoid... crct10dif is one of them. Applied. -- Lucas De Marchi