From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <md@linux.it>
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 22:56:47 +0200
To: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.de.marchi@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas De Schampheleire <patrickdepinguin@gmail.com>,
	linux-modules <linux-modules@vger.kernel.org>,
	Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add dummy definition of O_CLOEXEC
Message-ID: <20141001205647.GB13127@bongo.bofh.it>
References: <1412062906-27378-1-git-send-email-patrickdepinguin@gmail.com>
 <CAKi4VAKVL7oxZ6dvHbixeihtiOD2GDkHLknht_jSg3-+hWWGBQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="huq684BweRXVnRxX"
In-Reply-To: <CAKi4VAKVL7oxZ6dvHbixeihtiOD2GDkHLknht_jSg3-+hWWGBQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)
List-ID: <linux-modules.vger.kernel.org>


--huq684BweRXVnRxX
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Oct 01, Lucas De Marchi <lucas.de.marchi@gmail.com> wrote:

> Humn... Do we really want to support kernels older than 2.6.23?
No, not even pre-systemd udev supports them.

--=20
ciao,
Marco

--huq684BweRXVnRxX
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=Bv77
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--huq684BweRXVnRxX--