From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Zheng Yejian <zhengyejian1@huawei.com>
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org, mcgrof@kernel.org, mhiramat@kernel.org,
mark.rutland@arm.com, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
jpoimboe@kernel.org, linux-modules@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ftrace: Skip __fentry__ location of overridden weak functions
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 17:02:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240607150228.GR8774@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240607115211.734845-1-zhengyejian1@huawei.com>
On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 07:52:11PM +0800, Zheng Yejian wrote:
> ftrace_location() was changed to not only return the __fentry__ location
> when called for the __fentry__ location, but also when called for the
> sym+0 location after commit aebfd12521d9 ("x86/ibt,ftrace: Search for
> __fentry__ location"). That is, if sym+0 location is not __fentry__,
> ftrace_location() would find one over the entire size of the sym.
>
> However, there is case that more than one __fentry__ exist in the sym
> range (described below) and ftrace_location() would find wrong __fentry__
> location by binary searching, which would cause its users like livepatch/
> kprobe/bpf to not work properly on this sym!
>
> The case is that, based on current compiler behavior, suppose:
> - function A is followed by weak function B1 in same binary file;
> - weak function B1 is overridden by function B2;
> Then in the final binary file:
> - symbol B1 will be removed from symbol table while its instructions are
> not removed;
> - __fentry__ of B1 will be still in __mcount_loc table;
> - function size of A is computed by substracting the symbol address of
> A from its next symbol address (see kallsyms_lookup_size_offset()),
> but because symbol info of B1 is removed, the next symbol of A is
> originally the next symbol of B1. See following example, function
> sizeof A will be (symbol_address_C - symbol_address_A):
>
> symbol_address_A
> symbol_address_B1 (Not in symbol table)
> symbol_address_C
>
> The weak function issue has been discovered in commit b39181f7c690
> ("ftrace: Add FTRACE_MCOUNT_MAX_OFFSET to avoid adding weak function")
> but it didn't resolve the issue in ftrace_location().
>
> There may be following resolutions:
Oh gawd, sodding weak functions again.
I would suggest changing scipts/kallsyms.c to emit readily identifiable
symbol names for all the weak junk, eg:
__weak_junk_NNNNN
That instantly fixes the immediate problem and Steve's horrid hack can
go away.
Additionally, I would add a boot up pass that would INT3 fill all such
functions and remove/invalidate all
static_call/static_jump/fentry/alternative entry that is inside of them.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-07 15:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-07 11:52 [RFC PATCH] ftrace: Skip __fentry__ location of overridden weak functions Zheng Yejian
2024-06-07 15:02 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2024-06-07 15:39 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-06-11 1:56 ` Zheng Yejian
2024-06-11 9:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-06-11 9:36 ` Zheng Yejian
2024-11-13 7:32 ` Dropify
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240607150228.GR8774@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-modules@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=zhengyejian1@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).