linux-modules.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Werner Sembach <wse@tuxedocomputers.com>
Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König" <ukleinek@kernel.org>,
	"Luis Chamberlain" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	tux@tuxedocomputers.com, "Petr Pavlu" <petr.pavlu@suse.com>,
	"Sami Tolvanen" <samitolvanen@google.com>,
	"Daniel Gomez" <da.gomez@samsung.com>,
	linux-modules@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Thorsten Leemhuis" <linux@leemhuis.info>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] module: Block modules by Tuxedo from accessing GPL symbols
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 05:43:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2024111557-unlighted-giggle-0d86@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e32e9f5c-3841-41f7-9728-f998f123cc8a@tuxedocomputers.com>

On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 11:49:04AM +0100, Werner Sembach wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Am 14.11.24 um 11:31 schrieb Uwe Kleine-König:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > the kernel modules provided by Tuxedo on
> > https://gitlab.com/tuxedocomputers/development/packages/tuxedo-drivers
> > are licensed under GPLv3 or later. This is incompatible with the
> > kernel's license and so makes it impossible for distributions and other
> > third parties to support these at least in pre-compiled form and so
> > limits user experience and the possibilities to work on mainlining these
> > drivers.
> > 
> > This incompatibility is created on purpose to control the upstream
> > process. See https://fosstodon.org/@kernellogger/113423314337991594 for
> > a nice summary of the situation and some further links about the issue.
> > 
> > Note that the pull request that fixed the MODULE_LICENSE invocations to
> > stop claiming GPL(v2) compatibility was accepted and then immediately
> > reverted "for the time being until the legal stuff is sorted out"
> > (https://gitlab.com/tuxedocomputers/development/packages/tuxedo-drivers/-/commit/a8c09b6c2ce6393fe39d8652d133af9f06cfb427).
> 
> As already being implied by that commit message, this is sadly not an issue
> that can be sorted out over night.
> 
> We ended up in this situation as MODULE_LICENSE("GPL") on its own does not
> hint at GPL v2, if one is not aware of the license definition table in the
> documentation.

That's why it is documented, to explain this very thing.  Please don't
suggest that documenting this is somehow not providing a hint.  That's
just not going to fly with any lawyer who reads any of this, sorry.

greg k-h

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-11-15  4:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20241114103151eucas1p133de0b231bf06bf8cd42621347a0ed17@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2024-11-14 10:31 ` [PATCH 0/2] module: Block modules by Tuxedo from accessing GPL symbols Uwe Kleine-König
2024-11-14 10:31   ` [PATCH 1/2] module: Put known GPL offenders in an array Uwe Kleine-König
2024-11-14 16:08     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-15  4:40     ` Greg KH
2024-11-14 10:31   ` [PATCH 2/2] module: Block modules by Tuxedo from accessing GPL symbols Uwe Kleine-König
2024-11-14 11:56     ` Daniel Gomez
2024-11-15  4:40       ` Greg KH
2024-11-14 16:09     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-14 19:21       ` Aaron Rainbolt
2024-11-14 23:06         ` Al Viro
2024-11-15  4:40     ` Greg KH
2024-11-18 10:11     ` Werner Sembach
2024-11-14 10:49   ` [PATCH 0/2] " Werner Sembach
2024-11-14 11:14     ` Uwe Kleine-König
2024-11-14 11:44       ` Werner Sembach
2024-11-16 17:49       ` Uwe Kleine-König
2024-11-16 18:41         ` Werner Sembach
2024-11-15  4:43     ` Greg KH [this message]
2024-11-15  6:09       ` Werner Sembach
2024-11-15  6:30         ` Greg KH
2024-11-15  7:29         ` Uwe Kleine-König
2024-11-15  9:00           ` Werner Sembach
2024-11-15  9:18             ` Greg KH
2024-11-15  9:40               ` Werner Sembach
2024-11-15 10:22                 ` Greg KH
2024-11-15 10:59                   ` Werner Sembach
2024-11-15 12:01                     ` Greg KH
2024-11-15 10:51                 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2024-11-15 11:01                   ` Werner Sembach
2024-11-14 11:50   ` Daniel Gomez
2024-11-20 14:11   ` Hans de Goede

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2024111557-unlighted-giggle-0d86@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=da.gomez@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-modules@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@leemhuis.info \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=petr.pavlu@suse.com \
    --cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
    --cc=tux@tuxedocomputers.com \
    --cc=ukleinek@kernel.org \
    --cc=wse@tuxedocomputers.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).