From: chensong_2000@189.cn
To: rafael@kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org, mturquette@baylibre.com,
sboyd@kernel.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, agk@redhat.com,
snitzer@kernel.org, mpatocka@redhat.com, bmarzins@redhat.com,
song@kernel.org, yukuai@fnnas.com, linan122@huawei.com,
jason.wessel@windriver.com, danielt@kernel.org,
dianders@chromium.org, horms@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
paulmck@kernel.org, frederic@kernel.org, mcgrof@kernel.org,
petr.pavlu@suse.com, da.gomez@kernel.org,
samitolvanen@google.com, atomlin@atomlin.com,
jpoimboe@kernel.org, jikos@kernel.org, mbenes@suse.cz,
pmladek@suse.com, joe.lawrence@redhat.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
mhiramat@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com
Cc: linux-modules@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
live-patching@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@lists.linux.dev,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Song Chen <chensong_2000@189.cn>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 1/2] kernel/notifier: replace single-linked list with double-linked list for reverse traversal
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2026 15:01:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260415070137.17860-1-chensong_2000@189.cn> (raw)
From: Song Chen <chensong_2000@189.cn>
The current notifier chain implementation uses a single-linked list
(struct notifier_block *next), which only supports forward traversal
in priority order. This makes it difficult to handle cleanup/teardown
scenarios that require notifiers to be called in reverse priority order.
A concrete example is the ordering dependency between ftrace and
livepatch during module load/unload. see the detail here [1].
This patch replaces the single-linked list in struct notifier_block
with a struct list_head, converting the notifier chain into a
doubly-linked list sorted in descending priority order. Based on
this, a new function notifier_call_chain_reverse() is introduced,
which traverses the chain in reverse (ascending priority order).
The corresponding blocking_notifier_call_chain_reverse() is also
added as the locking wrapper for blocking notifier chains.
The internal notifier_call_chain_robust() is updated to use
notifier_call_chain_reverse() for rollback: on error, it records
the failing notifier (last_nb) and the count of successfully called
notifiers (nr), then rolls back exactly those nr-1 notifiers in
reverse order starting from last_nb's predecessor, without needing
to know the total length of the chain.
With this change, subsystems with symmetric setup/teardown ordering
requirements can register a single notifier_block with one priority
value, and rely on blocking_notifier_call_chain() for forward
traversal and blocking_notifier_call_chain_reverse() for reverse
traversal, without needing hard-coded call sequences or separate
notifier registrations for each direction.
[1]:https://lore.kernel.org/all
/alpine.LNX.2.00.1602172216491.22700@cbobk.fhfr.pm/
Signed-off-by: Song Chen <chensong_2000@189.cn>
---
drivers/acpi/sleep.c | 1 -
drivers/clk/clk.c | 2 +-
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 2 +-
drivers/md/dm-integrity.c | 1 -
drivers/md/md.c | 1 -
include/linux/notifier.h | 26 ++---
kernel/debug/debug_core.c | 1 -
kernel/notifier.c | 219 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
net/ipv4/nexthop.c | 2 +-
9 files changed, 201 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
index 132a9df98471..b776dbd5a382 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
@@ -56,7 +56,6 @@ static int tts_notify_reboot(struct notifier_block *this,
static struct notifier_block tts_notifier = {
.notifier_call = tts_notify_reboot,
- .next = NULL,
.priority = 0,
};
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
index 47093cda9df3..b6fe380d0468 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -4862,7 +4862,7 @@ int clk_notifier_unregister(struct clk *clk, struct notifier_block *nb)
clk->core->notifier_count--;
/* XXX the notifier code should handle this better */
- if (!cn->notifier_head.head) {
+ if (list_empty(&cn->notifier_head.head)) {
srcu_cleanup_notifier_head(&cn->notifier_head);
list_del(&cn->node);
kfree(cn);
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 277884d91913..12637e742ffa 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ static void cpufreq_list_transition_notifiers(void)
mutex_lock(&cpufreq_transition_notifier_list.mutex);
- for (nb = cpufreq_transition_notifier_list.head; nb; nb = nb->next)
+ list_for_each_entry(nb, &cpufreq_transition_notifier_list.head, entry)
pr_info("%pS\n", nb->notifier_call);
mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_transition_notifier_list.mutex);
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c b/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c
index 06e805902151..ccdf75c40b62 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-integrity.c
@@ -3909,7 +3909,6 @@ static void dm_integrity_resume(struct dm_target *ti)
}
ic->reboot_notifier.notifier_call = dm_integrity_reboot;
- ic->reboot_notifier.next = NULL;
ic->reboot_notifier.priority = INT_MAX - 1; /* be notified after md and before hardware drivers */
WARN_ON(register_reboot_notifier(&ic->reboot_notifier));
diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
index 3ce6f9e9d38e..8249e78636ab 100644
--- a/drivers/md/md.c
+++ b/drivers/md/md.c
@@ -10480,7 +10480,6 @@ static int md_notify_reboot(struct notifier_block *this,
static struct notifier_block md_notifier = {
.notifier_call = md_notify_reboot,
- .next = NULL,
.priority = INT_MAX, /* before any real devices */
};
diff --git a/include/linux/notifier.h b/include/linux/notifier.h
index 01b6c9d9956f..b2abbdfcaadd 100644
--- a/include/linux/notifier.h
+++ b/include/linux/notifier.h
@@ -53,41 +53,41 @@ typedef int (*notifier_fn_t)(struct notifier_block *nb,
struct notifier_block {
notifier_fn_t notifier_call;
- struct notifier_block __rcu *next;
+ struct list_head __rcu entry;
int priority;
};
struct atomic_notifier_head {
spinlock_t lock;
- struct notifier_block __rcu *head;
+ struct list_head __rcu head;
};
struct blocking_notifier_head {
struct rw_semaphore rwsem;
- struct notifier_block __rcu *head;
+ struct list_head __rcu head;
};
struct raw_notifier_head {
- struct notifier_block __rcu *head;
+ struct list_head __rcu head;
};
struct srcu_notifier_head {
struct mutex mutex;
struct srcu_usage srcuu;
struct srcu_struct srcu;
- struct notifier_block __rcu *head;
+ struct list_head __rcu head;
};
#define ATOMIC_INIT_NOTIFIER_HEAD(name) do { \
spin_lock_init(&(name)->lock); \
- (name)->head = NULL; \
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&(name)->head); \
} while (0)
#define BLOCKING_INIT_NOTIFIER_HEAD(name) do { \
init_rwsem(&(name)->rwsem); \
- (name)->head = NULL; \
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&(name)->head); \
} while (0)
#define RAW_INIT_NOTIFIER_HEAD(name) do { \
- (name)->head = NULL; \
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&(name)->head); \
} while (0)
/* srcu_notifier_heads must be cleaned up dynamically */
@@ -97,17 +97,17 @@ extern void srcu_init_notifier_head(struct srcu_notifier_head *nh);
#define ATOMIC_NOTIFIER_INIT(name) { \
.lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(name.lock), \
- .head = NULL }
+ .head = LIST_HEAD_INIT((name).head) }
#define BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_INIT(name) { \
.rwsem = __RWSEM_INITIALIZER((name).rwsem), \
- .head = NULL }
+ .head = LIST_HEAD_INIT((name).head) }
#define RAW_NOTIFIER_INIT(name) { \
- .head = NULL }
+ .head = LIST_HEAD_INIT((name).head) }
#define SRCU_NOTIFIER_INIT(name, pcpu) \
{ \
.mutex = __MUTEX_INITIALIZER(name.mutex), \
- .head = NULL, \
+ .head = LIST_HEAD_INIT((name).head), \
.srcuu = __SRCU_USAGE_INIT(name.srcuu), \
.srcu = __SRCU_STRUCT_INIT(name.srcu, name.srcuu, pcpu, 0), \
}
@@ -170,6 +170,8 @@ extern int atomic_notifier_call_chain(struct atomic_notifier_head *nh,
unsigned long val, void *v);
extern int blocking_notifier_call_chain(struct blocking_notifier_head *nh,
unsigned long val, void *v);
+extern int blocking_notifier_call_chain_reverse(struct blocking_notifier_head *nh,
+ unsigned long val, void *v);
extern int raw_notifier_call_chain(struct raw_notifier_head *nh,
unsigned long val, void *v);
extern int srcu_notifier_call_chain(struct srcu_notifier_head *nh,
diff --git a/kernel/debug/debug_core.c b/kernel/debug/debug_core.c
index 0b9495187fba..a26a7683d142 100644
--- a/kernel/debug/debug_core.c
+++ b/kernel/debug/debug_core.c
@@ -1054,7 +1054,6 @@ dbg_notify_reboot(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long code, void *x)
static struct notifier_block dbg_reboot_notifier = {
.notifier_call = dbg_notify_reboot,
- .next = NULL,
.priority = INT_MAX,
};
diff --git a/kernel/notifier.c b/kernel/notifier.c
index 2f9fe7c30287..6f4d887771c4 100644
--- a/kernel/notifier.c
+++ b/kernel/notifier.c
@@ -14,39 +14,47 @@
* are layered on top of these, with appropriate locking added.
*/
-static int notifier_chain_register(struct notifier_block **nl,
+static int notifier_chain_register(struct list_head *nl,
struct notifier_block *n,
bool unique_priority)
{
- while ((*nl) != NULL) {
- if (unlikely((*nl) == n)) {
+ struct notifier_block *cur;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(cur, nl, entry) {
+ if (unlikely(cur == n)) {
WARN(1, "notifier callback %ps already registered",
n->notifier_call);
return -EEXIST;
}
- if (n->priority > (*nl)->priority)
- break;
- if (n->priority == (*nl)->priority && unique_priority)
+
+ if (n->priority == cur->priority && unique_priority)
return -EBUSY;
- nl = &((*nl)->next);
+
+ if (n->priority > cur->priority) {
+ list_add_tail(&n->entry, &cur->entry);
+ goto out;
+ }
}
- n->next = *nl;
- rcu_assign_pointer(*nl, n);
+
+ list_add_tail(&n->entry, nl);
+out:
trace_notifier_register((void *)n->notifier_call);
return 0;
}
-static int notifier_chain_unregister(struct notifier_block **nl,
+static int notifier_chain_unregister(struct list_head *nl,
struct notifier_block *n)
{
- while ((*nl) != NULL) {
- if ((*nl) == n) {
- rcu_assign_pointer(*nl, n->next);
+ struct notifier_block *cur;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(cur, nl, entry) {
+ if (cur == n) {
+ list_del(&n->entry);
trace_notifier_unregister((void *)n->notifier_call);
return 0;
}
- nl = &((*nl)->next);
}
+
return -ENOENT;
}
@@ -59,25 +67,25 @@ static int notifier_chain_unregister(struct notifier_block **nl,
* value of this parameter is -1.
* @nr_calls: Records the number of notifications sent. Don't care
* value of this field is NULL.
+ * @last_nb: Records the last called notifier block for rolling back
* Return: notifier_call_chain returns the value returned by the
* last notifier function called.
*/
-static int notifier_call_chain(struct notifier_block **nl,
+static int notifier_call_chain(struct list_head *nl,
unsigned long val, void *v,
- int nr_to_call, int *nr_calls)
+ int nr_to_call, int *nr_calls,
+ struct notifier_block **last_nb)
{
int ret = NOTIFY_DONE;
- struct notifier_block *nb, *next_nb;
-
- nb = rcu_dereference_raw(*nl);
+ struct notifier_block *nb;
- while (nb && nr_to_call) {
- next_nb = rcu_dereference_raw(nb->next);
+ if (!nr_to_call)
+ return ret;
+ list_for_each_entry(nb, nl, entry) {
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_NOTIFIERS
if (unlikely(!func_ptr_is_kernel_text(nb->notifier_call))) {
WARN(1, "Invalid notifier called!");
- nb = next_nb;
continue;
}
#endif
@@ -87,15 +95,118 @@ static int notifier_call_chain(struct notifier_block **nl,
if (nr_calls)
(*nr_calls)++;
+ if (last_nb)
+ *last_nb = nb;
+
if (ret & NOTIFY_STOP_MASK)
break;
- nb = next_nb;
- nr_to_call--;
+
+ if (nr_to_call-- == 0)
+ break;
}
return ret;
}
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(notifier_call_chain);
+/**
+ * notifier_call_chain_reverse - Informs the registered notifiers
+ * about an event reversely.
+ * @nl: Pointer to head of the blocking notifier chain
+ * @val: Value passed unmodified to notifier function
+ * @v: Pointer passed unmodified to notifier function
+ * @nr_to_call: Number of notifier functions to be called. Don't care
+ * value of this parameter is -1.
+ * @nr_calls: Records the number of notifications sent. Don't care
+ * value of this field is NULL.
+ * Return: notifier_call_chain returns the value returned by the
+ * last notifier function called.
+ */
+static int notifier_call_chain_reverse(struct list_head *nl,
+ struct notifier_block *start,
+ unsigned long val, void *v,
+ int nr_to_call, int *nr_calls)
+{
+ int ret = NOTIFY_DONE;
+ struct notifier_block *nb;
+ bool do_call = (start == NULL);
+
+ if (!nr_to_call)
+ return ret;
+
+ list_for_each_entry_reverse(nb, nl, entry) {
+ if (!do_call) {
+ if (nb == start)
+ do_call = true;
+ continue;
+ }
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_NOTIFIERS
+ if (unlikely(!func_ptr_is_kernel_text(nb->notifier_call))) {
+ WARN(1, "Invalid notifier called!");
+ continue;
+ }
+#endif
+ trace_notifier_run((void *)nb->notifier_call);
+ ret = nb->notifier_call(nb, val, v);
+
+ if (nr_calls)
+ (*nr_calls)++;
+
+ if (ret & NOTIFY_STOP_MASK)
+ break;
+
+ if (nr_to_call-- == 0)
+ break;
+ }
+ return ret;
+}
+NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(notifier_call_chain_reverse);
+
+/**
+ * notifier_call_chain_rcu - Informs the registered notifiers
+ * about an event for srcu notifier chain.
+ * @nl: Pointer to head of the blocking notifier chain
+ * @val: Value passed unmodified to notifier function
+ * @v: Pointer passed unmodified to notifier function
+ * @nr_to_call: Number of notifier functions to be called. Don't care
+ * value of this parameter is -1.
+ * @nr_calls: Records the number of notifications sent. Don't care
+ * value of this field is NULL.
+ * Return: notifier_call_chain returns the value returned by the
+ * last notifier function called.
+ */
+static int notifier_call_chain_rcu(struct list_head *nl,
+ unsigned long val, void *v,
+ int nr_to_call, int *nr_calls)
+{
+ int ret = NOTIFY_DONE;
+ struct notifier_block *nb;
+
+ if (!nr_to_call)
+ return ret;
+
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(nb, nl, entry) {
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_NOTIFIERS
+ if (unlikely(!func_ptr_is_kernel_text(nb->notifier_call))) {
+ WARN(1, "Invalid notifier called!");
+ continue;
+ }
+#endif
+ trace_notifier_run((void *)nb->notifier_call);
+ ret = nb->notifier_call(nb, val, v);
+
+ if (nr_calls)
+ (*nr_calls)++;
+
+ if (ret & NOTIFY_STOP_MASK)
+ break;
+
+ if (nr_to_call-- == 0)
+ break;
+ }
+ return ret;
+}
+NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(notifier_call_chain_rcu);
+
/**
* notifier_call_chain_robust - Inform the registered notifiers about an event
* and rollback on error.
@@ -111,15 +222,16 @@ NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(notifier_call_chain);
*
* Return: the return value of the @val_up call.
*/
-static int notifier_call_chain_robust(struct notifier_block **nl,
+static int notifier_call_chain_robust(struct list_head *nl,
unsigned long val_up, unsigned long val_down,
void *v)
{
int ret, nr = 0;
+ struct notifier_block *last_nb = NULL;
- ret = notifier_call_chain(nl, val_up, v, -1, &nr);
+ ret = notifier_call_chain(nl, val_up, v, -1, &nr, &last_nb);
if (ret & NOTIFY_STOP_MASK)
- notifier_call_chain(nl, val_down, v, nr-1, NULL);
+ notifier_call_chain_reverse(nl, last_nb, val_down, v, nr-1, NULL);
return ret;
}
@@ -220,7 +332,7 @@ int atomic_notifier_call_chain(struct atomic_notifier_head *nh,
int ret;
rcu_read_lock();
- ret = notifier_call_chain(&nh->head, val, v, -1, NULL);
+ ret = notifier_call_chain(&nh->head, val, v, -1, NULL, NULL);
rcu_read_unlock();
return ret;
@@ -238,7 +350,7 @@ NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(atomic_notifier_call_chain);
*/
bool atomic_notifier_call_chain_is_empty(struct atomic_notifier_head *nh)
{
- return !rcu_access_pointer(nh->head);
+ return list_empty(&nh->head);
}
/*
@@ -340,7 +452,7 @@ int blocking_notifier_call_chain_robust(struct blocking_notifier_head *nh,
* racy then it does not matter what the result of the test
* is, we re-check the list after having taken the lock anyway:
*/
- if (rcu_access_pointer(nh->head)) {
+ if (!list_empty(&nh->head)) {
down_read(&nh->rwsem);
ret = notifier_call_chain_robust(&nh->head, val_up, val_down, v);
up_read(&nh->rwsem);
@@ -375,15 +487,52 @@ int blocking_notifier_call_chain(struct blocking_notifier_head *nh,
* racy then it does not matter what the result of the test
* is, we re-check the list after having taken the lock anyway:
*/
- if (rcu_access_pointer(nh->head)) {
+ if (!list_empty(&nh->head)) {
down_read(&nh->rwsem);
- ret = notifier_call_chain(&nh->head, val, v, -1, NULL);
+ ret = notifier_call_chain(&nh->head, val, v, -1, NULL, NULL);
up_read(&nh->rwsem);
}
return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blocking_notifier_call_chain);
+/**
+ * blocking_notifier_call_chain_reverse - Call functions reversely in
+ * a blocking notifier chain
+ * @nh: Pointer to head of the blocking notifier chain
+ * @val: Value passed unmodified to notifier function
+ * @v: Pointer passed unmodified to notifier function
+ *
+ * Calls each function in a notifier chain in turn. The functions
+ * run in a process context, so they are allowed to block.
+ *
+ * If the return value of the notifier can be and'ed
+ * with %NOTIFY_STOP_MASK then blocking_notifier_call_chain()
+ * will return immediately, with the return value of
+ * the notifier function which halted execution.
+ * Otherwise the return value is the return value
+ * of the last notifier function called.
+ */
+
+int blocking_notifier_call_chain_reverse(struct blocking_notifier_head *nh,
+ unsigned long val, void *v)
+{
+ int ret = NOTIFY_DONE;
+
+ /*
+ * We check the head outside the lock, but if this access is
+ * racy then it does not matter what the result of the test
+ * is, we re-check the list after having taken the lock anyway:
+ */
+ if (!list_empty(&nh->head)) {
+ down_read(&nh->rwsem);
+ ret = notifier_call_chain_reverse(&nh->head, NULL, val, v, -1, NULL);
+ up_read(&nh->rwsem);
+ }
+ return ret;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blocking_notifier_call_chain_reverse);
+
/*
* Raw notifier chain routines. There is no protection;
* the caller must provide it. Use at your own risk!
@@ -450,7 +599,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(raw_notifier_call_chain_robust);
int raw_notifier_call_chain(struct raw_notifier_head *nh,
unsigned long val, void *v)
{
- return notifier_call_chain(&nh->head, val, v, -1, NULL);
+ return notifier_call_chain(&nh->head, val, v, -1, NULL, NULL);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(raw_notifier_call_chain);
@@ -543,7 +692,7 @@ int srcu_notifier_call_chain(struct srcu_notifier_head *nh,
int idx;
idx = srcu_read_lock(&nh->srcu);
- ret = notifier_call_chain(&nh->head, val, v, -1, NULL);
+ ret = notifier_call_chain_rcu(&nh->head, val, v, -1, NULL);
srcu_read_unlock(&nh->srcu, idx);
return ret;
}
@@ -566,7 +715,7 @@ void srcu_init_notifier_head(struct srcu_notifier_head *nh)
mutex_init(&nh->mutex);
if (init_srcu_struct(&nh->srcu) < 0)
BUG();
- nh->head = NULL;
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nh->head);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(srcu_init_notifier_head);
diff --git a/net/ipv4/nexthop.c b/net/ipv4/nexthop.c
index c942f1282236..0afcba2967c7 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/nexthop.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/nexthop.c
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ static const struct nla_policy rtm_nh_res_bucket_policy_get[] = {
static bool nexthop_notifiers_is_empty(struct net *net)
{
- return !net->nexthop.notifier_chain.head;
+ return list_empty(&net->nexthop.notifier_chain.head);
}
static void
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-04-15 7:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-15 7:01 chensong_2000 [this message]
2026-04-15 7:40 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] kernel/notifier: replace single-linked list with double-linked list for reverse traversal Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260415070137.17860-1-chensong_2000@189.cn \
--to=chensong_2000@189.cn \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=atomlin@atomlin.com \
--cc=bmarzins@redhat.com \
--cc=da.gomez@kernel.org \
--cc=danielt@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jason.wessel@windriver.com \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=joe.lawrence@redhat.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linan122@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-modules@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=petr.pavlu@suse.com \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=yukuai@fnnas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox