From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Sasha Levin" <sashal@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-modules@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/4] kallsyms: extend lineinfo to loadable modules
Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2026 14:42:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260801144250.E347C1F00AC4@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260801143219.3975824-3-sashal@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Integer overflow in `mod_lineinfo_filenames_off()` and `module_lookup_lineinfo_section()` size calculations bypasses bounds checks, leading to out-of-bounds memory accesses in NMI/panic context.
- [Medium] `gen_lineinfo` fails to apply `.debug_info` relocations, causing `dwarf_getsrclines` to read the wrong line program for all CUs except the first in an ET_REL module.
--
--- Patch [2]: [PATCH v8 2/4] kallsyms: extend lineinfo to loadable modules ---
commit 4466d01d38fe10716b6638bf8ed427b3c7f20a03
Author: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: kallsyms: extend lineinfo to loadable modules
This commit extends CONFIG_KALLSYMS_LINEINFO to loadable kernel modules.
It post-processes each .ko at build time to embed a lineinfo section,
which is used at runtime to annotate stack traces from module code.
> diff --git a/include/linux/mod_lineinfo.h b/include/linux/mod_lineinfo.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..75d0bfba6ce57
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/mod_lineinfo.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,122 @@
[ ... ]
> +static inline u32 mod_lineinfo_addrs_off(void)
> +{
> + return sizeof(struct mod_lineinfo_header);
> +}
> +
> +static inline u32 mod_lineinfo_file_ids_off(u32 num_entries)
> +{
> + return mod_lineinfo_addrs_off() + num_entries * sizeof(u32);
> +}
> +
> +static inline u32 mod_lineinfo_lines_off(u32 num_entries)
> +{
> + /* u16 file_ids[] may need 2-byte padding to align lines[] to 4 bytes */
> + u32 off = mod_lineinfo_file_ids_off(num_entries) +
> + num_entries * sizeof(u16);
> + return (off + 3) & ~3u;
> +}
> +
> +static inline u32 mod_lineinfo_file_offsets_off(u32 num_entries)
> +{
> + return mod_lineinfo_lines_off(num_entries) + num_entries * sizeof(u32);
> +}
> +
> +static inline u32 mod_lineinfo_filenames_off(u32 num_entries, u32 num_files)
> +{
> + return mod_lineinfo_file_offsets_off(num_entries) +
> + num_files * sizeof(u32);
> +}
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/kernel/module/kallsyms.c b/kernel/module/kallsyms.c
> index f23126d804b25..b0e703e29708b 100644
> --- a/kernel/module/kallsyms.c
> +++ b/kernel/module/kallsyms.c
[ ... ]
> +static bool module_lookup_lineinfo_section(const void *blob, u32 blob_size,
> + u32 hdr_offset,
> + unsigned int section_offset,
> + unsigned int min_offset,
> + const char **file,
> + unsigned int *line)
> +{
[ ... ]
> + /*
> + * Validate counts before multiplying — sizing arithmetic could
> + * otherwise overflow on 32-bit with a malformed blob. Each entry
> + * contributes one u32 (addrs), one u16 (file_ids), and one u32
> + * (lines); each file contributes one u32 (file_offsets).
> + */
> + {
> + u32 avail = blob_size - hdr_offset;
> + u32 needed = mod_lineinfo_filenames_off(num_entries, num_files);
> +
> + if (num_entries > U32_MAX / sizeof(u32))
> + return false;
> + if (num_files > U32_MAX / sizeof(u32))
> + return false;
> + if (needed > avail || filenames_size > avail - needed)
> + return false;
> + }
[Severity: High]
Can the needed calculation overflow before the bounds check is evaluated?
If num_entries is maliciously large (e.g., 0x33333334), the calculation in
mod_lineinfo_filenames_off() sums the array offsets using 32-bit unsigned
arithmetic (around 10 bytes per entry). This would wrap around modulo 2^32,
resulting in a small needed value that bypasses the needed > avail check.
A later binary search on addrs could then access out-of-bounds memory.
The division check on num_entries above only guards against a single u32
array's size, not the combined 10 bytes per entry.
> diff --git a/scripts/gen_lineinfo.c b/scripts/gen_lineinfo.c
> index a3ee54eaad05d..725a8dfbf011a 100644
> --- a/scripts/gen_lineinfo.c
> +++ b/scripts/gen_lineinfo.c
[ ... ]
> +static void apply_debug_line_relocations(Elf *elf)
> +{
[ ... ]
> + /* Find the relevant sections */
> + while ((scn = elf_nextscn(elf, scn)) != NULL) {
> + const char *name;
> +
> + if (!gelf_getshdr(scn, &shdr))
> + continue;
> + name = elf_strptr(elf, shstrndx, shdr.sh_name);
> + if (!name)
> + continue;
> +
> + if (!strcmp(name, ".debug_line"))
> + debug_line_scn = scn;
> + else if (!strcmp(name, ".rela.debug_line"))
> + rela_debug_line_scn = scn;
> + else if (!strcmp(name, ".rel.debug_line"))
> + rel_debug_line_scn = scn;
> + else if (shdr.sh_type == SHT_SYMTAB)
> + symtab_scn = scn;
> + }
[Severity: Medium]
Does this miss relocations for ET_REL modules that contain multiple object
files?
This loop collects and applies relocations for .debug_line, but appears to
omit .rela.debug_info and .rel.debug_info entirely.
Without the relocations applied to .debug_info, the DW_AT_stmt_list attribute
for all compile units might remain at offset 0.
> +static void process_dwarf(Dwarf *dwarf, unsigned long long text_addr,
> + struct covered_section *sections,
> + unsigned int num_sections)
> {
[ ... ]
> + if (dwarf_getsrclines(&cudie, &lines, &nlines) != 0)
> + goto next;
When dwarf_getsrclines() is later called in process_dwarf(), will it
repeatedly read the line program of only the first compile unit, leaving
most module functions without line info?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260801143219.3975824-1-sashal@kernel.org?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-01 14:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-01 14:32 [PATCH v8 0/4] kallsyms: embed source file:line info in kernel stack traces Sasha Levin
2026-08-01 14:32 ` [PATCH v8 1/4] " Sasha Levin
2026-08-01 14:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-01 14:32 ` [PATCH v8 2/4] kallsyms: extend lineinfo to loadable modules Sasha Levin
2026-08-01 14:42 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-01 14:32 ` [PATCH v8 3/4] kallsyms: delta-compress lineinfo tables for ~2.7x size reduction Sasha Levin
2026-08-01 14:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-01 14:32 ` [PATCH v8 4/4] kallsyms: add KUnit tests for lineinfo feature Sasha Levin
2026-08-01 14:45 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260801144250.E347C1F00AC4@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-modules@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox