From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Hao Ge" <hao.ge@linux.dev>
Cc: linux-modules@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/4] module: introduce SH_ENTSIZE_STANDALONE for separately allocated sections
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2026 08:33:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260902083338.706451F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260902081802.146145-3-hao.ge@linux.dev>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The `.data..percpu` section is incorrectly exported in sysfs with a dangling pointer to a freed temporary buffer.
--
commit 5082dc654c1b8850af405eef473b249c0d936de9
Author: Hao Ge <hao.ge@linux.dev>
module: introduce SH_ENTSIZE_STANDALONE for separately allocated sections
This commit introduces a new marker, SH_ENTSIZE_STANDALONE, to indicate
sections with a separate allocation. Instead of clearing the SHF_ALLOC
flag, it utilizes sh_entsize so that sections with separate allocations
like the percpu section can be correctly skipped during layout.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/499bb60c-c6e3-43a3-bd92-95a0567ece5e@suse.com/
> diff --git a/kernel/module/main.c b/kernel/module/main.c
> index d0e1e0bd2ad06..b114b815187a9 100644
> --- a/kernel/module/main.c
> +++ b/kernel/module/main.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -2822,7 +2810,8 @@ static int move_module(struct module *mod, struct load_info *info)
> Elf_Shdr *shdr = &info->sechdrs[i];
> const char *sname;
>
> - if (!(shdr->sh_flags & SHF_ALLOC))
> + if (!(shdr->sh_flags & SHF_ALLOC)
> + || shdr->sh_entsize == SH_ENTSIZE_STANDALONE)
> continue;
>
> sname = info->secstrings + shdr->sh_name;
[ ... ]
> @@ -2967,8 +2957,13 @@ static struct module *layout_and_allocate(struct load_info *info, int flags)
> if (err < 0)
> return ERR_PTR(err);
>
> + /* Repurpose sh_entsize to track where each section is allocated. */
> + for (i = 0; i < info->hdr->e_shnum; i++)
> + info->sechdrs[i].sh_entsize = ~0UL;
> +
> /* We will do a special allocation for per-cpu sections later. */
> - info->sechdrs[info->index.pcpu].sh_flags &= ~(unsigned long)SHF_ALLOC;
> + if (info->index.pcpu)
> + info->sechdrs[info->index.pcpu].sh_entsize = SH_ENTSIZE_STANDALONE;
>
> /*
> * Mark relevant sections as SHF_RO_AFTER_INIT so layout_sections() can
[Severity: Medium]
Because SHF_ALLOC is no longer cleared here, does this cause the
.data..percpu section to be incorrectly exported via sysfs?
With SHF_ALLOC remaining intact, sect_empty() in kernel/module/sysfs.c now
returns false for the percpu section, causing it to be processed instead of
skipped.
Additionally, because move_module() explicitly skips sections marked with
SH_ENTSIZE_STANDALONE, the sh_addr is never updated to the final allocated
memory.
This means when add_sect_attrs() exports the section:
kernel/module/sysfs.c:add_sect_attrs() {
...
if (sect_empty(sec))
continue;
...
sattr->private = (void *)sec->sh_addr;
...
}
Will sattr->private end up storing an unmodified sh_addr pointing to the
freed temporary load_info buffer (info->hdr)?
This appears to leak a stale vmalloc pointer address to userspace when
reading the sysfs file for the section.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260902081802.146145-1-hao.ge@linux.dev?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-02 8:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-02 8:17 [PATCH v7 0/4] alloc_tag and module codetag section fixes Hao Ge
2026-09-02 8:17 ` [PATCH v7 1/4] alloc_tag: move release_module_tags() above reserve_module_tags() Hao Ge
2026-09-02 8:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 8:18 ` [PATCH v7 2/4] module: introduce SH_ENTSIZE_STANDALONE for separately allocated sections Hao Ge
2026-09-02 8:33 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-03 6:00 ` Hao Ge
2026-09-04 15:25 ` Petr Pavlu
2026-09-04 16:10 ` Petr Pavlu
2026-09-02 8:18 ` [PATCH v7 3/4] module: allocate codetag sections before the regular module layout Hao Ge
2026-09-02 8:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 6:17 ` Hao Ge
2026-09-02 8:18 ` [PATCH v7 4/4] alloc_tag: release the reservation when populate fails Hao Ge
2026-09-02 8:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 22:05 ` [PATCH v7 0/4] alloc_tag and module codetag section fixes Andrew Morton
2026-09-03 6:30 ` Hao Ge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260902083338.706451F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=hao.ge@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-modules@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox