Linux Modules
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Fang Xieyan" <fangxy@xiaopeng.com>
Cc: linux-modules@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] module: Validate the __version_ext_names section offset
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 18:05:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260916180523.1F0E21F00898@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260916174753.14870-3-fangxy@xiaopeng.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] module: allows reading arbitrary file data for SHT_NOBITS sections
--

commit 7826bfa932aee0181b2db001dad06d62e3bc7702
Author: Fang Xieyan <fangxy@xiaopeng.com>
module: Validate the __version_ext_names section offset

This commit bounds the offset of the __version_ext_names section to prevent
an out-of-bounds read when encountering a SHT_NOBITS section. It adds a call
to validate_section_offset() in elf_validity_cache_index_versions() before
dereferencing the section's offset.

> diff --git a/kernel/module/main.c b/kernel/module/main.c
> index e36bfe4734d59..adaaaca5a4e68 100644
> --- a/kernel/module/main.c
> +++ b/kernel/module/main.c
> @@ -2296,6 +2296,16 @@ static int elf_validity_cache_index_versions(struct load_info *info, int flags)
>  	 * number of entries in every section.
>  	 */
>  	if (vers_ext_crc) {
> +		/*
> +		 * The name section is walked by its sh_offset and sh_size
> +		 * below. elf_validity_check_sectionheaders() exempts SHT_NOBITS
> +		 * sections from validate_section_offset(), so a __version_ext_names
> +		 * section of that type reaches here with an unvalidated sh_offset.
> +		 * Bound it before dereferencing hdr + sh_offset.
> +		 */
> +		if (validate_section_offset(info, &info->sechdrs[vers_ext_name]))
> +			return -ENOEXEC;

[Severity: Low]
Does this allow in-bounds SHT_NOBITS sections to pass, reading arbitrary
in-bounds file data as extended version names?

This would appear to violate ELF semantics since SHT_NOBITS sections are
not supposed to hold file data.

> +
>  		crc_count = info->sechdrs[vers_ext_crc].sh_size / sizeof(u32);
>  		name = (void *)info->hdr +
>  			info->sechdrs[vers_ext_name].sh_offset;

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260916174753.14870-1-fangxy@xiaopeng.com?part=2

      reply	other threads:[~2026-09-16 18:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-16 17:47 [PATCH 0/2] module: close two ELF section-validation gaps Fang Xieyan
2026-09-16 17:47 ` [PATCH 1/2] module: Sanitize the undefined sh_name of SHT_NULL sections Fang Xieyan
2026-09-16 17:47 ` [PATCH 2/2] module: Validate the __version_ext_names section offset Fang Xieyan
2026-09-16 18:05   ` sashiko-bot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260916180523.1F0E21F00898@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=fangxy@xiaopeng.com \
    --cc=linux-modules@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox