From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Hao Ge" <hao.ge@linux.dev>
Cc: "Petr Pavlu" <petr.pavlu@suse.com>, linux-modules@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 6/7] alloc_tag: skip percpu counter allocation when profiling is disabled
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 08:40:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260929084045.9E4591F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260929082014.160587-7-hao.ge@linux.dev>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] mm: crash on freeing static percpu variable when module load fails or profiling disabled
--
commit 1ed77a1b45b5a7a434417c336e13dff08f4838d1
Author: Hao Ge <hao.ge@linux.dev>
alloc_tag: skip percpu counter allocation when profiling is disabled
After shutdown_mem_profiling() clears mem_profiling_support,
needs_section_mem() returns false, so later modules have their codetag
section placed as regular data and never enter the alloc_tag maple tree.
codetag_load_module() still called load_module(), which allocated a percpu
counter for every tag; release_module_tags() could not find these modules
on unload, so the counters leaked.
> diff --git a/lib/codetag.c b/lib/codetag.c
> index a9cda4c962a30..a0b600720afc1 100644
> --- a/lib/codetag.c
> +++ b/lib/codetag.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -388,7 +390,11 @@ void codetag_unload_module(struct module *mod)
> ++cttype->content_id;
> }
> up_write(&cttype->mod_lock);
> - if (found && cttype->desc.free_section_mem)
> + /*
> + * A module whose module_load() returned -EOPNOTSUPP is not
> + * in the idr but may still hold reserved section memory.
> + */
> + if (cttype->desc.free_section_mem)
> cttype->desc.free_section_mem(mod, true);
> }
> mutex_unlock(&codetag_lock);
[Severity: High]
Does this unconditional call to free_section_mem() lead to a crash when
freeing statically allocated percpu memory?
On architectures defining CONFIG_ARCH_MODULE_NEEDS_WEAK_PER_CPU,
DEFINE_ALLOC_TAG initializes tag->counters to the statically allocated
&_shared_alloc_tag.
If a module load skips dynamic counter allocation (either because
mem_profiling_support is false and load_module() returns -EOPNOTSUPP, or if
alloc_percpu() fails with -ENOMEM), tag->counters remains pointing to
&_shared_alloc_tag.
Because free_section_mem() is now called unconditionally here on module unload
or load failure, it triggers the cleanup path for these uninitialized tags:
release_module_tags() -> clean_unused_counters()
In clean_unused_counters(), since the static _shared_alloc_tag has 0 bytes,
it unconditionally calls free_percpu(tag->counters):
mm/alloc_tag.c:clean_unused_counters() {
...
if (!counter.bytes) {
free_percpu(tag->counters);
tag->counters = NULL;
...
}
Calling free_percpu() on a statically allocated per-cpu variable that doesn't
belong to a managed chunk can corrupt memory and cause a crash.
> diff --git a/mm/alloc_tag.c b/mm/alloc_tag.c
> index 1a6108a596684..1106fc60dc89c 100644
> --- a/mm/alloc_tag.c
> +++ b/mm/alloc_tag.c
> @@ -981,6 +981,10 @@ static int load_module(struct module *mod, struct codetag *start, struct codetag
> struct alloc_tag *stop_tag;
> struct alloc_tag *tag;
>
> + /* Profiling disabled: load the module without its tags. */
> + if (!mem_profiling_support)
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> /* percpu counters for core allocations are already statically allocated */
> if (!mod)
> return 0;
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260929082014.160587-1-hao.ge@linux.dev?part=6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-29 8:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-29 8:20 [PATCH v11 0/7] alloc_tag and module codetag section fixes Hao Ge
2026-09-29 8:20 ` [PATCH v11 1/7] alloc_tag: move release_module_tags() above reserve_module_tags() Hao Ge
2026-09-29 8:20 ` [PATCH v11 2/7] mm/vmalloc: undo partial mappings inside the mapping functions Hao Ge
2026-09-29 8:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-30 10:12 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2026-10-04 17:42 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-10-09 8:23 ` Hao Ge
2026-10-08 6:53 ` Hao Ge
2026-10-08 8:09 ` Hao Ge
2026-10-08 8:13 ` Hao Ge
2026-09-29 8:20 ` [PATCH v11 3/7] alloc_tag: clean up the populate failure path Hao Ge
2026-10-04 17:55 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-09-29 8:20 ` [PATCH v11 4/7] module: introduce SH_ENTSIZE_STANDALONE for separately allocated sections Hao Ge
2026-09-29 8:20 ` [PATCH v11 5/7] module: allocate codetag sections before the regular module layout Hao Ge
2026-09-29 8:20 ` [PATCH v11 6/7] alloc_tag: skip percpu counter allocation when profiling is disabled Hao Ge
2026-09-29 8:40 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-29 8:20 ` [PATCH v11 7/7] alloc_tag: fix the /proc/allocinfo lifecycle Hao Ge
2026-10-04 18:23 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-10-09 11:16 ` Hao Ge
2026-09-29 20:44 ` [PATCH v11 0/7] alloc_tag and module codetag section fixes Andrew Morton
2026-09-30 2:39 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-09-30 3:26 ` Hao Ge
2026-09-30 8:34 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2026-10-04 17:42 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-10-04 18:37 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-10-09 11:30 ` Hao Ge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260929084045.9E4591F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=hao.ge@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-modules@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=petr.pavlu@suse.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox