Linux Modules
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Hao Ge" <hao.ge@linux.dev>
Cc: "Petr Pavlu" <petr.pavlu@suse.com>, linux-modules@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 6/7] alloc_tag: skip percpu counter allocation when profiling is disabled
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 08:40:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260929084045.9E4591F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260929082014.160587-7-hao.ge@linux.dev>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] mm: crash on freeing static percpu variable when module load fails or profiling disabled
--

commit 1ed77a1b45b5a7a434417c336e13dff08f4838d1
Author: Hao Ge <hao.ge@linux.dev>

alloc_tag: skip percpu counter allocation when profiling is disabled

After shutdown_mem_profiling() clears mem_profiling_support,
needs_section_mem() returns false, so later modules have their codetag
section placed as regular data and never enter the alloc_tag maple tree.
codetag_load_module() still called load_module(), which allocated a percpu
counter for every tag; release_module_tags() could not find these modules
on unload, so the counters leaked.

> diff --git a/lib/codetag.c b/lib/codetag.c
> index a9cda4c962a30..a0b600720afc1 100644
> --- a/lib/codetag.c
> +++ b/lib/codetag.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -388,7 +390,11 @@ void codetag_unload_module(struct module *mod)
>  			++cttype->content_id;
>  		}
>  		up_write(&cttype->mod_lock);
> -		if (found && cttype->desc.free_section_mem)
> +		/*
> +		 * A module whose module_load() returned -EOPNOTSUPP is not
> +		 * in the idr but may still hold reserved section memory.
> +		 */
> +		if (cttype->desc.free_section_mem)
>  			cttype->desc.free_section_mem(mod, true);
>  	}
>  	mutex_unlock(&codetag_lock);

[Severity: High]
Does this unconditional call to free_section_mem() lead to a crash when
freeing statically allocated percpu memory?

On architectures defining CONFIG_ARCH_MODULE_NEEDS_WEAK_PER_CPU,
DEFINE_ALLOC_TAG initializes tag->counters to the statically allocated
&_shared_alloc_tag.

If a module load skips dynamic counter allocation (either because
mem_profiling_support is false and load_module() returns -EOPNOTSUPP, or if
alloc_percpu() fails with -ENOMEM), tag->counters remains pointing to
&_shared_alloc_tag.

Because free_section_mem() is now called unconditionally here on module unload
or load failure, it triggers the cleanup path for these uninitialized tags:
release_module_tags() -> clean_unused_counters()

In clean_unused_counters(), since the static _shared_alloc_tag has 0 bytes,
it unconditionally calls free_percpu(tag->counters):

mm/alloc_tag.c:clean_unused_counters() {
	...
		if (!counter.bytes) {
			free_percpu(tag->counters);
			tag->counters = NULL;
	...
}

Calling free_percpu() on a statically allocated per-cpu variable that doesn't
belong to a managed chunk can corrupt memory and cause a crash.

> diff --git a/mm/alloc_tag.c b/mm/alloc_tag.c
> index 1a6108a596684..1106fc60dc89c 100644
> --- a/mm/alloc_tag.c
> +++ b/mm/alloc_tag.c
> @@ -981,6 +981,10 @@ static int load_module(struct module *mod, struct codetag *start, struct codetag
>  	struct alloc_tag *stop_tag;
>  	struct alloc_tag *tag;
>  
> +	/* Profiling disabled: load the module without its tags. */
> +	if (!mem_profiling_support)
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
>  	/* percpu counters for core allocations are already statically allocated */
>  	if (!mod)
>  		return 0;

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260929082014.160587-1-hao.ge@linux.dev?part=6

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-29  8:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-29  8:20 [PATCH v11 0/7] alloc_tag and module codetag section fixes Hao Ge
2026-09-29  8:20 ` [PATCH v11 1/7] alloc_tag: move release_module_tags() above reserve_module_tags() Hao Ge
2026-09-29  8:20 ` [PATCH v11 2/7] mm/vmalloc: undo partial mappings inside the mapping functions Hao Ge
2026-09-29  8:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-30 10:12   ` Uladzislau Rezki
2026-10-04 17:42     ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-10-09  8:23       ` Hao Ge
2026-10-08  6:53     ` Hao Ge
2026-10-08  8:09       ` Hao Ge
2026-10-08  8:13       ` Hao Ge
2026-09-29  8:20 ` [PATCH v11 3/7] alloc_tag: clean up the populate failure path Hao Ge
2026-10-04 17:55   ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-09-29  8:20 ` [PATCH v11 4/7] module: introduce SH_ENTSIZE_STANDALONE for separately allocated sections Hao Ge
2026-09-29  8:20 ` [PATCH v11 5/7] module: allocate codetag sections before the regular module layout Hao Ge
2026-09-29  8:20 ` [PATCH v11 6/7] alloc_tag: skip percpu counter allocation when profiling is disabled Hao Ge
2026-09-29  8:40   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-29  8:20 ` [PATCH v11 7/7] alloc_tag: fix the /proc/allocinfo lifecycle Hao Ge
2026-10-04 18:23   ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-10-09 11:16     ` Hao Ge
2026-09-29 20:44 ` [PATCH v11 0/7] alloc_tag and module codetag section fixes Andrew Morton
2026-09-30  2:39   ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-09-30  3:26     ` Hao Ge
2026-09-30  8:34       ` Uladzislau Rezki
2026-10-04 17:42       ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-10-04 18:37       ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-10-09 11:30         ` Hao Ge

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260929084045.9E4591F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=hao.ge@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-modules@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=petr.pavlu@suse.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox