From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 062471DF99C; Mon, 1 Sep 2025 18:29:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756751344; cv=none; b=VcvJPCGBk6zFHSdNPfKHam94RUcIhIWTz4wCXtaYntQvJSuawPmXDxWIi31K4vWW8wXm9pdnRdO3YAVNrJyChpzcKPHVytHzXRMMYARVFkJqjIIUg0VmsflJfyXG0IGWvEpeyPQG0r+yq3AV0UDKN8B1frznjswbZVCo8E+e3Jo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756751344; c=relaxed/simple; bh=dzOhUlVc9gBe0VMWsZUvVSBE7vCESrQZhPDVMQ4opio=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=ZI2gYy1XM9BSWk+5Xb5tKUOZKKT3S95/QQEDCHNaGrhSi0R97UFTYl53zbCFS5E/2Cqa9nostXSkYBNzffCgm+EoJHc6XoNNTkQHpDA7rPvUlu39pJ5OzkFxrCdRv+gvZlYs7pHelkFFH8t3cWsR1C45RZ28LlXwjhqcdF5NSRM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=h5ZEhyQk; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="h5ZEhyQk" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6B094C4CEF0; Mon, 1 Sep 2025 18:29:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1756751343; bh=dzOhUlVc9gBe0VMWsZUvVSBE7vCESrQZhPDVMQ4opio=; h=Date:Reply-To:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=h5ZEhyQkJz4XvfOZztAx5EqhVSNb+TqkYzuwip5vAdV+6MHwZuzIfgp3834e+ZitU 0YfeaDm9TPvVNvleqt1fOl4ZcMLk1MpKOBf743EaY18a/D5QfEfTCfzaR+mTcYC6fU L0prernfE1rxCI1OPZRGmglgD9EwGG432y13hzJ+8kNmL1BHQHktsIk6CN3FJfa90B 0ZVwOdOkJk/8SISnKL1TsEiGhAROrOc9KQQTdq9/t0vLl+pc8hk0pdCtmjfmHE6Ryj 4cq5vi5pXFqVuL6BclvtanCG1kCMx1Ioxt7oDhaZhn5rpaAmuTHzApJ6935COseDC0 /bYbjIFzr4z8w== Message-ID: <851c227e-5d1e-44bb-80ca-d9e230e8ccfe@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2025 20:29:00 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-modules@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Reply-To: Daniel Gomez Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] module: show why force load fails To: Jinchao Wang , Luis Chamberlain , Petr Pavlu , Sami Tolvanen , linux-modules@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20250829084927.156676-1-wangjinchao600@gmail.com> <20250829084927.156676-3-wangjinchao600@gmail.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Daniel Gomez Organization: kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20250829084927.156676-3-wangjinchao600@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 29/08/2025 10.49, Jinchao Wang wrote: > Include reason in error message when force loading is disabled. > > Signed-off-by: Jinchao Wang > --- > kernel/module/main.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/kernel/module/main.c b/kernel/module/main.c > index c66b26184936..e7484c6ce6e3 100644 > --- a/kernel/module/main.c > +++ b/kernel/module/main.c > @@ -1083,6 +1083,7 @@ int try_to_force_load(struct module *mod, const char *reason) > add_taint_module(mod, TAINT_FORCED_MODULE, LOCKDEP_NOW_UNRELIABLE); > return 0; > #else > + pr_err("%s: %s, force load is not supported\n", mod->name, reason); > return -ENOEXEC; > #endif > } I don't think is good to inform via kernel log buffer what the kernel supports or what not. And definitely, not as an error.