Re: [PATCH 3/4] tpm_crb_ffa: Include linux/slab.h for kzalloc_obj() and kfree()

[Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@suse.com>]

On 7/7/26 5:43 PM, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
> - [Low] The commit message incorrectly claims that the file uses `kzalloc_obj()` instead of `kzalloc()`.
> --
> 
> --- Patch [3]: [PATCH 3/4] tpm_crb_ffa: Include linux/slab.h for kzalloc_obj() and kfree() ---
> commit a56e4cf89267d12126bd70f7981a05c846959016
> Author: Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@suse.com>
> 
> tpm_crb_ffa: Include linux/slab.h for kzalloc_obj() and kfree()
> 
> This commit adds the missing linux/slab.h inclusion to tpm_crb_ffa.c.
> It removes the reliance on indirect inclusion through linux/module.h.
> This prepares for the eventual removal of linux/elf.h from linux/module.h.
> 
>> tpm_crb_ffa: Include linux/slab.h for kzalloc_obj() and kfree()
> 
> [Severity: Low]
> This isn't a bug, but there appears to be a typo in the commit subject.
> Did you mean kzalloc() instead of kzalloc_obj()? Looking at
> tpm_crb_ffa_probe() in the driver, it correctly calls kzalloc().
> 
>> The drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb_ffa.c file uses kzalloc_obj() and kfree(),
> 
> [Severity: Low]
> This isn't a bug, but the same typo is also present here in the commit
> description.
> 

I don't see a typo here. The code uses the kzalloc_obj() macro:

https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/v7.2-rc2/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb_ffa.c#L339