From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Calvin Owens <jcalvinowens@gmail.com>
Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Naveen N Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com>,
Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>,
David S Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-modules@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/4] kprobes: Allow kprobes with CONFIG_MODULES=n
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 09:22:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZelrH2hiUmaomDv2@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2af01251ca21d79fa29092505d192f1f1b746cff.1709676663.git.jcalvinowens@gmail.com>
On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 12:05:10PM -0800, Calvin Owens wrote:
> If something like this is merged down the road, it can go in at leisure
> once the module_alloc change is in: it's a one-way dependency.
>
> Signed-off-by: Calvin Owens <jcalvinowens@gmail.com>
> ---
> arch/Kconfig | 2 +-
> kernel/kprobes.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c | 11 +++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
When I did this in my last execmem posting, I think I've got slightly less
ugly ifdery, you may want to take a look at that:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230918072955.2507221-13-rppt@kernel.org
> diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig
> index cfc24ced16dd..e60ce984d095 100644
> --- a/arch/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/Kconfig
> @@ -52,8 +52,8 @@ config GENERIC_ENTRY
>
> config KPROBES
> bool "Kprobes"
> - depends on MODULES
> depends on HAVE_KPROBES
> + select MODULE_ALLOC
> select KALLSYMS
> select TASKS_RCU if PREEMPTION
> help
> diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
> index 9d9095e81792..194270e17d57 100644
> --- a/kernel/kprobes.c
> +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
> @@ -1556,8 +1556,12 @@ static bool is_cfi_preamble_symbol(unsigned long addr)
> str_has_prefix("__pfx_", symbuf);
> }
>
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULES)
> static int check_kprobe_address_safe(struct kprobe *p,
> struct module **probed_mod)
> +#else
> +static int check_kprobe_address_safe(struct kprobe *p)
> +#endif
> {
> int ret;
>
> @@ -1580,6 +1584,7 @@ static int check_kprobe_address_safe(struct kprobe *p,
> goto out;
> }
>
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULES)
Plain #ifdef will do here and below. IS_ENABLED is for usage withing the
code, like
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULES))
;
> /* Check if 'p' is probing a module. */
> *probed_mod = __module_text_address((unsigned long) p->addr);
> if (*probed_mod) {
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-07 7:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-06 20:05 [RFC][PATCH 0/4] Make bpf_jit and kprobes work with CONFIG_MODULES=n Calvin Owens
2024-03-06 20:05 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/4] module: mm: Make module_alloc() generally available Calvin Owens
2024-03-07 14:43 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-03-08 20:53 ` Calvin Owens
2024-03-08 2:16 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-03-08 20:43 ` Calvin Owens
2024-03-06 20:05 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/4] bpf: Allow BPF_JIT with CONFIG_MODULES=n Calvin Owens
2024-03-07 22:09 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-03-08 21:04 ` Calvin Owens
2024-03-06 20:05 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/4] kprobes: Allow kprobes " Calvin Owens
2024-03-07 7:22 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2024-03-08 2:46 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-03-08 20:36 ` Calvin Owens
2024-03-07 22:16 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-03-08 21:02 ` Calvin Owens
2024-03-08 2:46 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-03-08 20:57 ` Calvin Owens
2024-03-06 20:05 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/4] selftests/bpf: Support testing the !MODULES case Calvin Owens
2024-03-06 21:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/4] Make bpf_jit and kprobes work with CONFIG_MODULES=n Luis Chamberlain
2024-03-06 23:23 ` Calvin Owens
2024-03-07 1:58 ` Song Liu
2024-03-08 2:50 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-03-08 2:55 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-03-08 20:27 ` Calvin Owens
2024-03-07 7:13 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-03-08 2:45 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-03-25 22:46 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZelrH2hiUmaomDv2@kernel.org \
--to=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jcalvinowens@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-modules@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).