From: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>
To: Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez <jtornosm@redhat.com>
Cc: lucas.demarchi@intel.com, linux-modules@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH kmod] testsuite: add tests for weak dependencies
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 15:58:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zov-e-a_KQyJb8LI@arch-x395> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240530070836.9438-1-jtornosm@redhat.com>
Hello Jose,
On 2024/05/30, Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez wrote:
> The following tests to verify weak dependencies have been implemented:
> 1) modprobe test to check that related weakdep modules are not loaded
> due to being a weakdep.
> 2) depmod test to check weakdep output.
> 3) user test to check that configuration files with weakdep are parsed
> correctly and related weakdep modules can be read correctly from user
> applications.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez <jtornosm@redhat.com>
> ---
Seems like this commit has regressed make distcheck on my end. Namely
I'm running the following commands:
git clone ...
cd kmod
git clean -fxd
./autogen.sh c
make distcheck
Result in:
...
make[5]: *** No rule to make target '.../kmod-32/_build/sub/testsuite/module-playground/mod-weakdep.o', needed by '.../kmod-32/_build/sub/testsuite/module-playground/mod-weakdep.mod'. Stop.
make[4]: *** [Makefile:1903: .../kmod-32/_build/sub/testsuite/module-playground] Error 2
Can you reproduce it on your end?
While in the area, a couple of question if I may:
- Should we move the new weakdeps API in libkmod/libkmod.sym near the
end in a separate LIBKMOD_XX section?
As-is, it looks like we're adding symbols to what should be a frozen set
(aka LIBKMOD_5, which was released decade+ ago).
Admittedly there was a similar erroneous(?) change not loo long ago -
9becaae ("libkmod: Add lookup from module name").
@Lucas can/should we fix the kmod_module_new_from_name_lookup symbol in
the version script?
- Is this work related to the weak-modules used in RHEL/Fedora [1]?
Alternatively, would the RedHat team consider having the weak-modules
solution in upstream kmod?
... assuming Lucas is OK with the idea. I'm approaching with with my
dkms co-maintainer hat on, where the fewer "if distro == X" logic we
have the better.
Thanks in advance,
Emil
[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kmod/blob/rawhide/f/weak-modules
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-08 14:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-30 7:08 [PATCH kmod] testsuite: add tests for weak dependencies Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez
2024-06-14 19:17 ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-07-08 14:58 ` Emil Velikov [this message]
2024-07-09 5:11 ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-07-09 7:45 ` Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zov-e-a_KQyJb8LI@arch-x395 \
--to=emil.l.velikov@gmail.com \
--cc=jtornosm@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-modules@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).