linux-modules.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolas Schier <nsc@kernel.org>
To: Alexey Gladkov <legion@kernel.org>
Cc: Charles Mirabile <cmirabil@redhat.com>,
	da.gomez@samsung.com, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-modules@vger.kernel.org,
	masahiroy@kernel.org, mcgrof@kernel.org, nathan@kernel.org,
	petr.pavlu@suse.com, samitolvanen@google.com,
	sfr@canb.auug.org.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 7/8] modpost: Create modalias for builtin modules
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2025 21:52:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aOgSaNejdcBWKXx8@levanger> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aOToOeNGiaFVM0Ds@example.org>

On Tue, Oct 07, 2025 at 12:15:21PM +0200, Alexey Gladkov wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2025 at 09:16:37PM -0400, Charles Mirabile wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 10:05:51AM +0200, Alexey Gladkov wrote:
> > > For some modules, modalias is generated using the modpost utility and
> > > the section is added to the module file.
> > > 
> > > When a module is added inside vmlinux, modpost does not generate
> > > modalias for such modules and the information is lost.
> > > 
> > > As a result kmod (which uses modules.builtin.modinfo in userspace)
> > > cannot determine that modalias is handled by a builtin kernel module.
> > > 
> > > $ cat /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:14.0/modalias
> > > pci:v00008086d0000A36Dsv00001043sd00008694bc0Csc03i30
> > > 
> > > $ modinfo xhci_pci
> > > name:           xhci_pci
> > > filename:       (builtin)
> > > license:        GPL
> > > file:           drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci
> > > description:    xHCI PCI Host Controller Driver
> > > 
> > > Missing modalias "pci:v*d*sv*sd*bc0Csc03i30*" which will be generated by
> > > modpost if the module is built separately.
> > > 
> > > To fix this it is necessary to generate the same modalias for vmlinux as
> > > for the individual modules. Fortunately '.vmlinux.export.o' is already
> > > generated from which '.modinfo' can be extracted in the same way as for
> > > vmlinux.o.
> > 
> > Hi -
> > 
> > This patch broke RISC-V builds for me. During the final objcopy where the new
> > symbols are supposed to be stripped, an error occurs producing lots of error
> > messages similar to this one:
> > 
> > riscv64-linux-gnu-objcopy: not stripping symbol `__mod_device_table__...'
> > because it is named in a relocation
> > 
> > It does not occur using defconfig, but I was able to bisect my way to this
> > commit and then reduce my config delta w.r.t defconfig until I landed on:
> > 
> > cat > .config <<'EOF'
> > CONFIG_RELOCATABLE=y
> > CONFIG_KASAN=y
> > EOF
> > ARCH=riscv CROSS_COMPILE=riscv64-linux-gnu- make olddefconfig
> > ARCH=riscv CROSS_COMPILE=riscv64-linux-gnu- make -j $(nproc)
> > ...
> >   LD      vmlinux.unstripped
> >   NM      System.map
> >   SORTTAB vmlinux.unstripped
> >   CHKREL  vmlinux.unstripped
> >   OBJCOPY vmlinux
> >   OBJCOPY modules.builtin.modinfo
> >   GEN     modules.builtin
> > riscv64-linux-gnu-objcopy: not stripping symbol `<long symbol name>'
> > because it is named in a relocation
> > <repeats with different symbol names about a dozen times>
> > make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.vmlinux:97: vmlinux] Error 1
> > make[3]: *** Deleting file 'vmlinux'
> > make[2]: *** [Makefile:1242: vmlinux] Error 2
> > make[1]: *** [/tmp/linux/Makefile:369: __build_one_by_one] Error 2
> > make: *** [Makefile:248: __sub-make] Error 2
> > 
> > I confirmed that reverting this commit fixes the issue.

Thanks for the report!

> 
> Hm. Indeed. I haven't found a good solution yet, but you can use the
> following patch to unlock compilation. It won't solve the problem, it will
> only hide it.
> 
> --- a/scripts/Makefile.vmlinux
> +++ b/scripts/Makefile.vmlinux
> @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ endif
>  remove-section-y                                   := .modinfo
>  remove-section-$(CONFIG_ARCH_VMLINUX_NEEDS_RELOCS) += '.rel*'
> 
> -remove-symbols := -w --strip-symbol='__mod_device_table__*'
> +remove-symbols := -w --strip-unneeded-symbol='__mod_device_table__*'
> 
>  # To avoid warnings: "empty loadable segment detected at ..." from GNU objcopy,
>  # it is necessary to remove the PT_LOAD flag from the segment.
> 

Is it problematic to hide that?  Otherwise we'd have to revert the
patch, right?

Kind regards,
Nicolas


  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-09 20:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-18  8:05 [PATCH v8 0/8] Add generated modalias to modules.builtin.modinfo Alexey Gladkov
2025-09-18  8:05 ` [PATCH v8 1/8] s390: vmlinux.lds.S: Reorder sections Alexey Gladkov
2025-09-18  8:05 ` [PATCH v8 2/8] kbuild: always create intermediate vmlinux.unstripped Alexey Gladkov
2025-09-18  8:05 ` [PATCH v8 3/8] kbuild: keep .modinfo section in vmlinux.unstripped Alexey Gladkov
2025-09-24  6:29   ` Nicolas Schier
2025-09-18  8:05 ` [PATCH v8 4/8] kbuild: extract modules.builtin.modinfo from vmlinux.unstripped Alexey Gladkov
2025-09-18  8:05 ` [PATCH v8 5/8] scsi: Always define blogic_pci_tbl structure Alexey Gladkov
2025-09-18  8:05 ` [PATCH v8 6/8] modpost: Add modname to mod_device_table alias Alexey Gladkov
2025-09-24  6:31   ` Nicolas Schier
2025-09-18  8:05 ` [PATCH v8 7/8] modpost: Create modalias for builtin modules Alexey Gladkov
2025-09-24  6:38   ` Nicolas Schier
2025-10-07  1:16   ` Charles Mirabile
2025-10-07 10:15     ` Alexey Gladkov
2025-10-09 19:52       ` Nicolas Schier [this message]
2025-10-10  5:37         ` Nathan Chancellor
2025-10-10  8:02           ` Alexey Gladkov
2025-10-10 10:58             ` Alexey Gladkov
2025-10-10 13:24           ` Charles Mirabile
2025-09-18  8:05 ` [PATCH v8 8/8] kbuild: vmlinux.unstripped should always depend on .vmlinux.export.o Alexey Gladkov
2025-09-24  6:39   ` Nicolas Schier
2025-09-18 17:35 ` [PATCH v8 0/8] Add generated modalias to modules.builtin.modinfo Nathan Chancellor
2025-09-24 16:17 ` Nathan Chancellor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aOgSaNejdcBWKXx8@levanger \
    --to=nsc@kernel.org \
    --cc=cmirabil@redhat.com \
    --cc=da.gomez@samsung.com \
    --cc=legion@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-modules@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=petr.pavlu@suse.com \
    --cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).