Linux Modules
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Yunseong Kim" <yunseong.kim@est.tech>,
	"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
	"Shuah Khan" <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"James Morris" <jmorris@namei.org>,
	"Randy Dunlap" <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	"Andrey Konovalov" <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
	"Alexander Potapenko" <glider@google.com>,
	"Dmitry Vyukov" <dvyukov@google.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>, "Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
	"Boqun Feng" <boqun@kernel.org>,
	"Waiman Long" <longman@redhat.com>,
	"Luis Chamberlain" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	"Petr Pavlu" <petr.pavlu@suse.com>,
	"Daniel Gomez" <da.gomez@kernel.org>,
	"Sami Tolvanen" <samitolvanen@google.com>,
	"Aaron Tomlin" <atomlin@atomlin.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	"Frederic Weisbecker" <frederic@kernel.org>,
	"Neeraj Upadhyay" <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>,
	"Joel Fernandes" <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>,
	"Josh Triplett" <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	"Uladzislau Rezki" <urezki@gmail.com>,
	"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	"Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	"Lai Jiangshan" <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	Zqiang <qiang.zhang@linux.dev>,
	"Juri Lelli" <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	"Vincent Guittot" <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	"Dietmar Eggemann" <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	"Ben Segall" <bsegall@google.com>, "Mel Gorman" <mgorman@suse.de>,
	"Valentin Schneider" <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	"K Prateek Nayak" <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Nathan Chancellor" <nathan@kernel.org>,
	"Nicolas Schier" <nsc@kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@kernel.org>,
	"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
	"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-modules@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] x86/kcov: allow instrumenting noisy objects for early boot coverage
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2026 16:35:09 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-188168@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261027-early-kcov-v1-2-6f2f053255ad@est.tech>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] x86/kcov: instrumenting apic/ crashes selftest() on FRED timer entry
--

commit c1145245b36a2aa7f3b165ab0f5b126b2c810470
Author: Yunseong Kim <yunseong.kim@est.tech>

x86/kcov: allow instrumenting noisy objects for early boot coverage

This commit switches several x86 Makefile exclusions from hardcoded n to
$(kcov-noisy) so that CONFIG_KCOV_INSTRUMENT_NOISY=y can collect early boot
coverage from arch/x86/kernel/, arch/x86/kernel/apic/, and arch/x86/lib/.

> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/Makefile b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/Makefile
> index 581db89477f92..146cbd766c924 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/Makefile
> @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
>  
>  # Leads to non-deterministic coverage that is not a function of syscall inputs.
>  # In particular, smp_apic_timer_interrupt() is called in random places.
> -KCOV_INSTRUMENT		:= n
> +KCOV_INSTRUMENT		:= $(kcov-noisy)

[Severity: High]
Does instrumenting arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.o cause a NULL pointer
dereference during boot when CONFIG_KCOV_INSTRUMENT_NOISY=y and
CONFIG_KCOV_SELFTEST=y on FRED-enabled x86_64 systems?

In arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c, DEFINE_IDTENTRY_SYSVEC(sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt)
expands via arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:

    void fred_##func(struct pt_regs *regs)
    {
        instr_##func (regs);
    }

Unlike the IDT entry wrapper sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt(),
fred_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt() is not marked noinstr or
__no_sanitize_coverage. When apic.o is instrumented with KCOV,
fred_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt() and the inlined
instr_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt() -> run_sysvec_on_irqstack_cond() ->
call_on_irqstack_cond() call into __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc() before
irq_enter_rcu() adds HARDIRQ_OFFSET to preempt_count (and again after
irq_exit_rcu() removes HARDIRQ_OFFSET).

During boot, after rest_init() -> early_kcov_stop() clears
init_task.kcov_area to NULL, device_initcall(kcov_init) invokes selftest()
in kernel/kcov.c:

    start = jiffies;
    WRITE_ONCE(current->kcov_mode, KCOV_MODE_TRACE_PC);
    while ((jiffies - start) * MSEC_PER_SEC / HZ < 300)
        ;
    WRITE_ONCE(current->kcov_mode, 0);

While selftest() spins waiting for timer interrupts to advance jiffies with
current->kcov_area == NULL, the first LAPIC timer interrupt under FRED
enters fred_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt() while in_task() in
check_kcov_mode() is still true, reaching __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc() in
kernel/kcov.c:

    area = t->kcov_area;
    /* The first 64-bit word is the number of subsequent PCs. */
    pos = READ_ONCE(area[0]) + 1;

and dereferencing NULL.

In addition, during normal task KCOV tracing on FRED systems, if a LAPIC
timer interrupt preempts a traced task inside __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc() or
write_comp_data() between reading area[0] and writing back the updated
count, can the nested KCOV calls in fred_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt() have
their area[0] updates overwritten when the interrupted context resumes and
stores its stale index?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261027-early-kcov-v1-0-6f2f053255ad@est.tech?part=2

      reply	other threads:[~2026-10-28 16:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-27 16:34 [PATCH RFC 0/2] kcov: collect early boot coverage of init_task Yunseong Kim
2026-10-27 16:34 ` [PATCH RFC 1/2] " Yunseong Kim
2026-10-28 16:35   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-27 16:34 ` [PATCH RFC 2/2] x86/kcov: allow instrumenting noisy objects for early boot coverage Yunseong Kim
2026-10-28 16:35   ` sashiko-bot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-188168@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
    --cc=atomlin@atomlin.com \
    --cc=boqun@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=da.gomez@kernel.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-modules@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
    --cc=nsc@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=petr.pavlu@suse.com \
    --cc=qiang.zhang@linux.dev \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yunseong.kim@est.tech \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox