From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michal Samek <webmaster@tony.cz>
Subject: Re: Who knows what was changed in 1.1.3.3 or 1.1.3.4 about file
	locking?
Date: 14 Nov 2002 14:37:12 +0100
Sender: linux-msdos-owner@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <1037281030.12228.85.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0211071756510.20669-200000@enm-bo-lt.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Return-path: <linux-msdos-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0211071756510.20669-200000@enm-bo-lt.localdomain>
List-Id: <linux-msdos.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
To: Bart Oldeman <oldeman@math.ohio-state.edu>
Cc: Linux-MSDOS Mailing list <linux-msdos@vger.kernel.org>

On P=E1, 2002-11-08 at 00:00, Bart Oldeman wrote:

> Attached is a quick&dirty "proof of concept" 64-bit file offset patch=
=2E Of
> course it will need to be changed to be compatible with older libc's =
and
> kernels.
>=20
> Bart


There is a small typo in your patch; mfs.c after patching, line 3796.
I hope there should be:

(unsigned long)( ...

instead of=20

(unsigned long))(...

It compiles now; I'm going to check the locking behaviour.

--=20
Michal Samek <webmaster@tony.cz>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-msdos" =
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html