From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Neri Subject: Re: [v6 PATCH 01/21] x86/mpx: Use signed variables to compute effective addresses Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 18:40:15 -0700 Message-ID: <1493170815.36058.20.camel@ranerica-desktop> References: <20170308003254.27833-1-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> <20170308003254.27833-2-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> <20170411215601.kycakoyogyfdosi5@pd.tnic> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170411215601.kycakoyogyfdosi5@pd.tnic> Sender: linux-msdos-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andy Lutomirski , Peter Zijlstra , Andrew Morton , Brian Gerst , Chris Metcalf , Dave Hansen , Paolo Bonzini , Masami Hiramatsu , Huang Rui , Jiri Slaby , Jonathan Corbet , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Paul Gortmaker , Vlastimil Babka , Chen Yucong , Alexandre Julliard , Stas Sergeev , Fenghua Yu On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 23:56 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 04:32:34PM -0800, Ricardo Neri wrote: > > Even though memory addresses are unsigned. The operands used to compute the > > ... unsigned, the operands ... Oops! I will correct.