From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [v6 PATCH 08/21] x86/insn-eval: Add utility function to get
 segment descriptor base address
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 15:52:41 -0700
Message-ID: <1493247161.36058.77.camel@ranerica-desktop>
References: <20170308003254.27833-1-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
         <20170308003254.27833-9-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
         <20170420082533.hwc6eon3aom43qzo@pd.tnic>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-msdos-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20170420082533.hwc6eon3aom43qzo@pd.tnic>
Sender: linux-msdos-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-msdos.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>, Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>, Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Chen Yucong <slaoub@gmail.com>, Alexandre Julliard <julliard@winehq.org>, Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu>

On Thu, 2017-04-20 at 10:25 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > + * insn_get_seg_base() - Obtain base address contained in
> descriptor
> > + * @regs:    Set of registers containing the segment selector
> > + * @insn:    Instruction structure with selector override prefixes
> > + * @regoff:  Operand offset, in pt_regs, of which the selector is
> needed
> > + * @use_default_seg: Use the default segment instead of prefix
> overrides
> 
> I'm wondering whether you really need that bool or you can deduce this
> from pt_regs... I guess I'll see...

Probably insn_get_seg_base() itself can verify if there are segment
override prefixes in the struct insn. If yes, use them except for
specific cases such as CS.

On an unrelated note, I still have the problem of using DS vs ES for
string instructions. Perhaps instead of a use_default_seg flag, a
string_instruction flag that indicates how to determine the default
segment.

Thanks and BR,
Ricardo