From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Neri Subject: Re: [v6 PATCH 11/21] insn/eval: Incorporate segment base in address computation Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 18:31:17 -0700 Message-ID: <1493256677.36058.84.camel@ranerica-desktop> References: <20170308003254.27833-1-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> <20170308003254.27833-12-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> <20170421145533.fg32dcf2af7mksxa@pd.tnic> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170421145533.fg32dcf2af7mksxa@pd.tnic> Sender: linux-msdos-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andy Lutomirski , Peter Zijlstra , Andrew Morton , Brian Gerst , Chris Metcalf , Dave Hansen , Paolo Bonzini , Masami Hiramatsu , Huang Rui , Jiri Slaby , Jonathan Corbet , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Paul Gortmaker , Vlastimil Babka , Chen Yucong , Alexandre Julliard , Stas Sergeev , Fenghua Yu On Fri, 2017-04-21 at 16:55 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 04:32:44PM -0800, Ricardo Neri wrote: > > insn_get_addr_ref returns the effective address as defined by the > > Please end function names with parentheses. Will do. > > > section 3.7.5.1 Vol 1 of the Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software > > Developer's Manual. In order to compute the linear address, we must add > > to the effective address the segment base address as set in the segment > > descriptor. Furthermore, the segment descriptor to use depends on the > > register that is used as the base of the effective address. The effective > > base address varies depending on whether the operand is a register or a > > memory address and on whether a SiB byte is used. > > > > In most cases, the segment base address will be 0 if the USER_DS/USER32_DS > > segment is used or if segmentation is not used. However, the base address > > is not necessarily zero if a user programs defines its own segments. This > > is possible by using a local descriptor table. > > > > Since the effective address is a signed quantity, the unsigned segment > > base address saved in a separate variable and added to the final effective > > ".. is saved..." I will correct this. Thanks and BR, Ricardo