From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Neri Subject: Re: [v6 PATCH 10/21] x86/insn-eval: Do not use R/EBP as base if mod in ModRM is zero Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 18:57:50 -0700 Message-ID: <1494554270.118905.45.camel@ranerica-desktop> References: <20170308003254.27833-1-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> <20170308003254.27833-11-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> <20170421105258.q4vqrephtm7t3h4c@pd.tnic> <1493256599.36058.83.camel@ranerica-desktop> <20170507172050.ma6beli46fho2s3k@pd.tnic> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170507172050.ma6beli46fho2s3k@pd.tnic> Sender: linux-msdos-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andy Lutomirski , Peter Zijlstra , Andrew Morton , Brian Gerst , Chris Metcalf , Dave Hansen , Paolo Bonzini , Masami Hiramatsu , Huang Rui , Jiri Slaby , Jonathan Corbet , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Paul Gortmaker , Vlastimil Babka , Chen Yucong , Alexandre Julliard , Stas Sergeev , Fenghua Yu On Sun, 2017-05-07 at 19:20 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 06:29:59PM -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote: > > > if (X86_MODRM_MOD(insn->modrm.value) == 0 && > > > X86_MODRM_RM(insn->modrm.value) == 5) > > > > > > looks more understandable to me. > > > > Should I go with !(X86_MODRM_MOD(insn->modrm.value)) as you suggested in > > other patches? > > Ah, yes pls. > I did this in v7[1]. Thanks and BR, Ricardo [1]. https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/5/5/399