From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Neri Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 10/26] x86/insn-eval: Add utility functions to get segment selector Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 12:04:21 -0700 Message-ID: <1497553461.24288.170.camel@ranerica-desktop> References: <20170505181724.55000-1-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> <20170505181724.55000-11-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> <20170530103521.fb3wvp4crqapremh@pd.tnic> <1497551871.24288.169.camel@ranerica-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1497551871.24288.169.camel@ranerica-desktop> Sender: linux-msdos-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andy Lutomirski , Peter Zijlstra , Andrew Morton , Brian Gerst , Chris Metcalf , Dave Hansen , Paolo Bonzini , Masami Hiramatsu , Huang Rui , Jiri Slaby , Jonathan Corbet , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Paul Gortmaker , Vlastimil Babka , Chen Yucong , Alexandre Julliard , Stas Sergeev , Fenghua Yu On Thu, 2017-06-15 at 11:37 -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote: > > Yuck, didn't we talk about this already? > > I am sorry Borislav. I thought you agreed that I could use the values > of > the segment override prefixes to identify the segment registers [1]. This time with the reference: [1]. https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/5/5/377