From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Neri Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 07/26] x86/insn-eval: Do not BUG on invalid register type Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 12:03:11 -0700 Message-ID: <1498590191.133434.56.camel@ranerica-desktop> References: <20170505181724.55000-1-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> <20170505181724.55000-8-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> <20170529163748.bmihhr4j3hznbhcn@pd.tnic> <1496729218.24288.82.camel@ranerica-desktop> <20170606115842.ei3uowcgxwta2v5g@pd.tnic> <1496795332.24288.89.camel@ranerica-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-msdos-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Stas Sergeev Cc: linux-msdos Hi Stas, On Wed, 2017-06-07 at 21:54 +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote: > Hi Ricardo, would you mind unsubscribing > linux-msdos@ from all your future mails on > this subject? Otherwise I am afraid there > would be no subscribers left when you are > finally done. :) Sure! I will drop linux-msdos in the subsequent round of patches. > I think all non-kernel-dev MLs should be > treated with more care. Eg your initial > questions were certainly on-topic, but the > kernel patch-series (esp in such quantity) > are definitely not. Sure thing. I apologize for such a large quantity of e-mail. I just wanted to not miss your input and the inputs of your ML. I agree that at this point this can be handled in the kernel-specific MLs. Thanks and BR, Ricardo PS. Just bear with me in a couple of extra e-mails while the discussion on v7 is finished. I promise this is the last one! Thanks and BR, Ricardo