From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: pesarif Subject: Re: Changes between 1.01 and 1.02 Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 17:01:08 +1000 Sender: linux-msdos-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <200206111701.08995.pesarif@bigpond.com> References: <02061019180401.24962@lighthouse> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Return-path: In-Reply-To: <02061019180401.24962@lighthouse> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: marcus.roeckrath@gmx.de, linux-msdos@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 11 Jun 2002 03:18, Marcus Roeckrath wrote: > Hi, > > until now I'm using SuSE 7.2 and dosemu 1.0.1 which was shipped with SuSE > 7.2. Now I examined the dosemu 1.0.3 shipped with SuSE 7.3 and found > several differences between both packages. > 1.0.3? You must have a very new version... > A lot of file names have changed: f. e. dos to dosemu and so on. > > The /etc/dosemu.users isn't there anymore. > dosemu is now designed to be run for each individual user. > I'm using symlinks c/d pointing to mounted real dos drives in > /var/lib/dosemu in dosemu 1.0.1. Has this possibility gone in 1.0.2? > Officially /var/lib/dosemu has gone. Try putting them in your home directory. But if you copy dosemu.bin to /usr/bin/dos, you can just run dos and it will act like it use to with global paths. > Can someone tell me if an update to 1.0.2 could solve the problems running > dpmi software like dbase IV. Is there a significant better serial code > which was not working as good as it is wished when running dos fido > mailers. http://dosemu.sourceforge.net/~stas is a good place to look.