From: Ryan Underwood <nemesis-lists@icequake.net>
To: linux-msdos@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: App database, libsynth
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 19:59:18 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030713005918.GS1031@dbz.icequake.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F10A7F0.9060405@aknet.ru>
Hi Stas,
On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 04:29:36AM +0400, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Ryan Underwood wrote:
> >>In long mode there is no vm86.
> >It looked like the long vs legacy mode could be toggled
> >on a per segment basis in the rest of the information I
> >pasted. What do you think that refers to?
> That refers to that you seem like confusing
> the legacy mode with the compatibility mode.
> See this about switching:
> http://www.x86-64.org/lists/discuss/msg03333.html
Yes, that clears it up. So the legacy mode can only be enabled by
rebooting the system since it is too difficult to switch between legacy
and longmode on the fly. Furthermore, all the compatibility mode is
good for is running 32-bit applications in longmode.
> For now the decision was AFAIK to not mess with
> vm86() in x86-64 linux port. That may sound sad
> for us, but I guess they had some reasons for
> doing so.
I think most people will be using longmode on AMD-64 anyhow, so we
should get the fast CPU emulation going as soon as possible.
Side effect of the CPU emulation : can we do things with it like run
Win95 or other VCPI program underneath DOSEMU?
--
Ryan Underwood, <nemesis at icequake.net>, icq=10317253
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-13 0:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-13 0:29 App database, libsynth Stas Sergeev
2003-07-13 0:59 ` Ryan Underwood [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-07-17 16:07 Stas Sergeev
2003-07-17 23:09 ` Ryan Underwood
2003-07-14 17:43 Stas Sergeev
2003-07-14 21:06 ` Ryan Underwood
2003-07-15 8:38 ` Paul Eggleton
2003-07-15 10:10 ` Ryan Underwood
2003-07-15 12:26 ` Paul Eggleton
2003-07-15 23:48 ` Ryan Underwood
2003-07-13 19:50 Stas Sergeev
2003-07-13 21:27 ` Ryan Underwood
2003-07-13 2:37 Stas Sergeev
2003-07-13 5:00 ` Ryan Underwood
2003-07-13 0:21 Stas Sergeev
2003-07-13 0:56 ` Ryan Underwood
2003-07-13 0:09 Stas Sergeev
2003-07-12 23:47 Stas Sergeev
2003-07-13 0:50 ` Ryan Underwood
2003-07-11 19:02 Stas Sergeev
2003-07-11 19:59 ` Ryan Underwood
2003-07-11 20:23 ` Bart Oldeman
2003-07-11 22:03 ` Ryan Underwood
2003-07-12 20:57 ` Bart Oldeman
2003-07-12 22:40 ` Ryan Underwood
2003-07-12 16:30 ` Jan Willem Stumpel
2003-07-12 19:03 ` Ryan Underwood
2003-07-12 20:13 ` Jan Willem Stumpel
2003-07-12 19:19 ` Bart Oldeman
2003-07-10 17:20 App database Stas Sergeev
2003-07-11 17:30 ` App database, libsynth Ryan Underwood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030713005918.GS1031@dbz.icequake.net \
--to=nemesis-lists@icequake.net \
--cc=linux-msdos@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox