From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "A. Alper ATICI" Subject: Re: Approximation glitch in v1.1.5.7 Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 23:57:09 +0300 Sender: linux-msdos-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20030921205709.GA1556@deskt-xp> References: <20030921183936.GA132@deskt-xp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Bart Oldeman Cc: "A. Alper ATICI" , linux-msdos@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 08:11:35PM +0100, Bart Oldeman wrote: > > I don't think that would be the right thing to do. Approximations are only > used if no alternative is available in the real character set. > What do you mean by the real character set (in terms of the dosemurc options) ? > Did you check what happens if you remove the U_SMALL_LETTER_DOTLESS_I > approximation? As far as I know you'd get a question mark instead then > which is also not what you want. > Yes, it works after removal. Currently internal_char_set is set to cp857, external to iso-8859-9, layout to tr, term_char_set is default (this one gets set to latin1). Actually, DOTLESS_I was the only glitch, the other 8859-9-specific glyphs appear flawlessly. AFAICS, put_character_symbol() handles these via type_alt_num(). Without a latin5 setting for term_char_set, I wonder if this is working by chance or by design. Regards, A. Alper ATICI